Skip to Content

Need a little good news today? We've got plenty!

Posts with tag lawsuit

Axl Rose sues over Dr Pepper giveaway

Filed under: Extracurriculars

It seems not everyone had something to be thankful for on Thursday. Axl Rose, the frontman for Guns and Roses filed suit against Dr. Pepper Snapple Group for their recent Dr. Pepper giveaway. On November 23, Dr Pepper attempted to make good on their promise of free Dr. Pepper for all if Guns and roses released their long awaited "Chinese Democracy' album in 2008. Sadly, many users including WalletPop.com staff couldn't get the Drpepper.com to load which prompted Dr. Pepper to open up call lines to process coupon requests.

Charitable Celebrities

    Brad and Angelina are the reigning King and Queen of Celebrity Charity. Angelina is a U.N. Goodwill Ambassador, and the pair has traveled the world trying to bring relief to the neediest. According to tax records, the couple donated more than $8 million to charity in 2006 alone.

    Kevin Winter, Getty Images

    Oprah Winfrey has invested $40 million in her Academy for Girls in South Africa and raised over $58.3 million for various non-profits through her Oprah's Angel Network. Plus, she's given cars, hams, toasters, etc. to underprivileged audience members on her show.

    Denis Farrell, AP

    She gives no mercy on the bench, but famously nasty-on-TV Judge Judy Sheindlin is much more charitable in real life. She supports a mentoring program called Her Honor, which pairs high school juniors and students with dynamic female leaders.

    Brad Barket, Getty Images

    Paris Hilton is charitable... in theory. After her brief her prison stay, Paris Hilton announced she was traveling to on a philanthropic mission to Rwanda. Her inability to follow through made her less giving than some of her celebrity pals.

    Chad Buchanan, Getty Images

    George Clooney, who goes to United Way board meetings, traveled to Darfur and then headlined the Save Darfur rally in 2006. Clooney is a co-founder of Not On Our Watch, took part in the America: A Tribute to Heroes charity telethon for victims of 9/11... and he takes care of his own, too. He donated $25,000 to writers during the 2007 strike in Hollywood.

    Win McNamee, Getty Images

    Hurricane Katrina rallied many celebrities; Harry Connick Jr. and Branford Marsalis joined Habitat for Humanity's rebuilding efforts in their hometown of New Orleans.

    Al Bello, Getty Images

    Bob Geldof was one of the first to leverage fame in the name of charity by founding LiveAid, Live 8, and the Commission for Africa. He received an honorary knighthood from Queen Elizabeth II for his charitable work in 1986.

    Jens Meyer, AP

    Madonna, with daughter Lourdes, visited a U.N. Millennium village in Malawi and funded several projects. But the controversy surrounding her adopting of local boy David Banda made her goodwill a little fishy.

    Karel Prinsloo, AP

    Irish musician Bono speaks in front of British Prime Minister Tony Blair and Liberia's President Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf at a plenary entitled 'Delivering the Promise of Africa.' Bono has been instrumental in raising awareness of global poverty and the AIDS epidemic with his ONE and Product Red campaigns.

    Laurent Gillieron, AP

    Daryl Hannah was removed from a walnut tree in 2006 while protesting the demolition of a 14-acre urban garden in Los Angeles.

    Stefano Paltera, AP



In a bit of irony, no one was more upset that Guns n' Roses fans had to wait than Axl Rose himself. The main portion of Axl's lawsuit alleges that Dr. Pepper flubbed the giveaway, calling it an, "unmitigated disaster," but the suit isn't just looking out for the rights of American consumers. GnR is also seeking compensation for the use of their reputation in connection with the promotion.

Lawsuit may bring lower egg prices

Filed under: Food, Shopping

We've all noticed rising prices at the grocery store, and most of us can reconcile these prices with higher fuel costs. If it costs more for producers to get their goods to the store shelves, it's going to cost consumers more. It's nothing to be happy about, but at least we can point to the reason our grocery bills are so much higher.

But several lawsuits against the egg industry argue that it's not just expensive gas driving prices up. In 2006, the average retail price for a dozen eggs was $1.30. That price jumped all the way to $2.20 earlier this year, before receding slightly to $1.85. While this may add a few bucks to a shopper's grocery bill, the price jump is really squeezing restaurant owners, who buy eggs by the truckload. There are currently six major lawsuits against the egg industry, alleging schemes to drive up the price of eggs.

The egg producers argue that costs are higher for them, from feed to fuel, and that's the reason prices are higher. But the plaintiffs say producers are intentionally limiting egg supply, which is down to 7.5 billion dozen this year from 7.6 billion dozen in 2006, to drive up the price. They point to the Animal Care Certified Program, enacted in 2000 by the United Egg Producers cooperative, to which the defendants all belong. The UEP says the program was put in place at great expense to the farmers for the benefit of the hens -- requiring more space in their cages for the birds and regular inspections. The plaintiffs say that the UEP enacted this plan under the guise of hen welfare and better food safety, when really the only reason it exists is to limit hen numbers and thus limit egg production. According to a Humane Society spokesperson, if they really gave a cluck about the hens, they'd do a lot more than just give them bigger cages. Hens are still being raised in deplorable conditions at most of the big farms.

The success of the lawsuit hinges on whether or not the UEP is a cooperative or a trade organization. As a trade organization, the UEP would be subject to antitrust laws, which they seem to have already admitted violating. But the UEP and its lawyers say they are a cooperative and therefore are exempt from antitrust legislation. If the lawsuit is successful, we might just see a drop in egg prices -- but then again, if the producers are ordered to pay millions in damages, wouldn't that make them charge more for their eggs to protect the bottom line anyway? Here's hoping the law is clear that they can't do that...

Jay Leno sued in lawsuit over rare Duesenberg

Filed under: Extracurriculars, Ripoffs and Scams, Transportation, Wealth, Fraud

chromeIt's a rare car indeed: The Duesenberg, Model J Luxury Roadster was manufactured in a quantity of just 470 units between 1928 to 1937. Jay Leno was awfully lucky to get one of these cars. At least he was lucky, until the estate of the car's deceased owner got wind of it and filed a lawsuit to reclaim the car.

It seems that some questionable tactics are alleged to have been used in executing a "sham" auction through which Jay Leno came to take possession of the highly prized automobile. Bloomberg.com reported that the car's owner, John Straus, had at one time refused an offer from Jay Leno to purchase the car. Subsequently, Leno paid $180,000 for the car at auction, a mere fraction of its true value.

The garage which was storing the car had allegedly seized it, and had it sold to pay some delinquent parking fees. At this time, it is questioned whether or not those parking fees were even righteously delinquent. The plaintiff indicates that repeated attempts to pay outstanding parking fees were rejected, misdirected, or misapplied. The Bloomberg article stated: "Straus's parking account, which the garage claimed was in arrears, was credited $39,709 as a result of the sale."

Silence of the lambs? You have rights as a blogger!

Filed under: Extracurriculars, Technology

One of the most common fears avid bloggers have is "getting sued" if they provide a negative opinion or commentary about something or someone. Step on too many toes, and you might find yourself in some hot water. And there are plenty of companies and people who help by regularly threatening to sue bloggers, in an effort to keep them quiet.

But what about if you're running a site that caters to dissatisfied customers? Or if you've had a bad experience with a company and you want to blog about it to help warn others? Or if you simply have a blog as part of a business venture, and you wish to write about random topics that might include something negative about a person or company? Should you be forced to keep quiet about these things?

A website dedicated to helping bloggers, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, is trying to get the word out to bloggers about their legal rights. They've been running a bloggers' rights campaign to help bloggers learn about their rights, and to help protect the rights of free speech and anonymity on the internet. Many of the articles on the site were written a couple of years ago, but don't let that scare you. Not much has changed in terms of the rights of bloggers over the last couple of years.

Million dollar airline lawsuit is not warranted

Filed under: Travel

I'm the first person to admit that airlines treat their passengers like crap. And it's getting worse and worse. The airlines are all racing to see who can lose more money, mostly related to ever-increasing fuel costs. The passengers are merely a nuisance. Heck, they don't even seem to care if you have to sit on a disgusting toilet seat for an hour or two during your flight. (Blech.)

The one most predictable part of air travel now is that the customer is not in charge. The airlines are, and customers better make arrangements to deal with them. There is no more last-minute dash to the airport. Being assured of a seat on a flight isn't possible anymore either, as airlines frequently overbook flights and you might be the person left behind.

I'm not blaming airline passengers for being upset. But a million dollar lawsuit against Delta Air Lines because you weren't allowed on a flight and it ruined your vacation? I don't think so.

Lawyer, there's a fly in my water!

Filed under: Extracurriculars, Food, Ripoffs and Scams, Fraud

Have you heard this joke:

Waiter, there's a fly in my soup!
Don't worry sir, the spider on the breadroll will get him!


How about this one:

Waiter, there's a fly in my soup!
Force of habit, sir. Our chef used to be a tailor.

Or maybe this one:

Waiter, why is there a bee in my soup?
Sorry, sir. It's the fly's day off.


When I was a kid, I used to be a huge fan of cheesy jokes (I grew out of the tendency sometime last week, although I acknowledge that a relapse is possible). I collected all sorts of bad puns, double-entendres, and borsht-belt groaners. I knew dozens of knock-knocks, Tom Swifties, and, yes, fly jokes. Yet, for all the jokes I remember, here's one that I never heard:

Judge, judge, there are two flies in my bottled water!
Yes sir, now here's your $343,000.



Is a college education really worth the price?

Filed under: College

Recently, a Darmouth College lecturer announced her plans to sue her students. Apparently, Dr. Priya Venkatesan was angry about the fact that her pupils were complaining to her boss and openly disagreeing with her. The final straw was when one of her classes applauded a student who argued with her. She subsequently sent them an e-mail that read, in part:

Dear former class members [...] I regret to inform you that I am pursuing a lawsuit in which I am accusing some of you [...] of violating Title VII of anti-federal discrimination laws [...] I am also writing a book detailing my experiences as your instructor, which will "name names" so to speak. I have all your evaluations and these will be reproduced in the book [...] Have a nice day.

In the weeks since her e-mail, Venkatesan's lawsuit hasn't been going very well. According to some sources, she was unable to find a lawyer to represent her, while other sources stated that she has retained a lawyer and is suing Dartmouth College. The basis for her lawsuit is Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which guards against employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. Venkatesan apparently feels that, due to her race, Dartmouth failed to suitably protect her from her students.

Not a boring lawsuit, but a Boring lawsuit

Filed under: Entrepreneurship, Home, Real Estate, Technology

I wonder what Alfred Hitchcock would make of the Borings.

In 1954, the master of suspense directed Rear Window, a thoughtful thriller about a man (James Stewart) who spies on his neighbors -- from his own apartment. Aaron and Christine Boring of Pittsburgh feel that Google is spying on them, and they've lodged a lawsuit on the all-powerful search engine because of it.

Their complaint? Google's popular "Street View" mapping feature has a photo of their home available to online searchers, which they feel is an invasion of their privacy. Even worse, they contend, the invasion of privacy has caused them "mental suffering and has lessened the value of their home, which they purchased for $163,000, according to the web site, the Smoking Gun.


Driver sues dead biker's son over damage to car

Filed under: Extracurriculars, Ripoffs and Scams

Here's an item to file under "insensitive morons."

Businessman Tomas Delgado is suing the family of a 17-year old biker whom he struck and killed with his car. The reason? The impact of the boy's body caused $20,500 worth of damage to the body of his Audi A8.

He is also asking for money to cover the cost of the other vehicle he drove while his car was being fixed.

According to Reuters, the biker's "family won 33,000 euros compensation from Delgado's insurance company after the firm acknowledged he had been driving at excessive speed and this could have contributed to the incident."

Ugh. Hopefully a judge will dismiss the suit with some strong words for this reckless insensitive brute.

Lawsuit crazy consumers now suing real estate brokers

Filed under: Home, Real Estate, Ripoffs and Scams

There are bad things happening for which people deserve to be sued. And then there are situations in which consumers just made bad decisions or didn't do their homework. Suing someone in those cases is ridiculous.

Like this case: Marty and Vernon Ummel are suing a real estate agent saying it's his fault that they paid too much for their house. They say Mike Little, an agent with ReMax Associates, hid "comps" from them, the information about the value of other comparable homes selling in a neighborhood.

The Ummels paid $1.2 million for their home in August 2005, and shortly after moving in, they found that a comparable house was available in the neighborhood for $105,000 less. Other houses in the neighborhood were also selling for less, and the Ummels say the agent didn't want to risk them backing out of the deal, so he didn't tell them about these other homes.

I guess the issue here is whether or not the agent should tell a buyer what the neighborhood comps are. My opinion? No. If the buyer asks, I think the agent has a duty to give accurate information. Beyond that, buyer beware.