We got your number: 'Executive customer service' can get you better bank service
Filed under: Banks, Credit cards
Pssst! ... Want to know a secret? Banks actually have two customer-service departments. The one all of you are probably familiar with is regular customer service. But financial institutions also have what's called "executive customer service" - and these guys (and gals) can perform magic. The blog Consumerist dedicated this post to a reader's experience with Chase's executive customer service. The short version: After being turned down by ordinary customer service when he asked for a lower rate, Chase's executive customer service department dropped the cardholder's APR from 26% to 9% for a year. He also got three months' worth of finance charges refunded.

For most people calling customer service to deal with a complaint is a rather mundane affair. You dial in, climb through a complex phone tree and listen to inexplicably staticy hold music with interruptions that jolt you to attention only to be told, that "your call is important to us." 

Dear WalletPop:
One of the knocks on General Motors has long been that the company is arrogant and out of touch with the needs of its customers.
Airing your frustrations with a company or a product is nothing new. For decades consumers have complained to their coworkers, friends and family when a transaction goes bad.
Bank of America complained that the credit markets were so tight, soooooooo tight, that it couldn't possibly generate cash in the private sector, and that was why it needed a federal bailout.
Maybe it was the sauce?
Is the customer always right? OK, they're not always right. But shouldn't consumers at least feel as though they are valued? Particularly in today's economy, where customer retention and growth is tougher and tougher, you would think the low-cost investment of being responsive to customers would be a wise move.
Last week we reported that Amazon's customer service department
For our recent series
I recently received my bank statement from one of the passbook accounts that I own. My initial deposit of $200 was down to $152. Apparently, I was charged for having a "dormant" account which then put my total below the required minimum of $200. Because the account had fallen below this minimum, I now was being charged extra for having the account. Naturally, I was a bit upset. I thought that you put money in the bank to grow the account, not watch it go down.