Wal-Mart's sick leave policy risks spreading swine flu
Filed under: Health
With swine flu in full swing, Wal-Mart's punitive sick leave policy is discouraging employees from calling in sick, lest they earn enough demerits to be fired, according to a report by the National Labor Committee.Wal-Mart employees who miss one or more days due to sickness or other reasons, including caring for a sick child, earn a demerit point and lose eight hours of wages. Employees with more than three absences in a six-month period will be disciplined, and four demerits in six months leads to warnings that can lead to dismissal.
A fifth absence, even if it's a sick day, will result in "active coaching" by management, according to the NLC report, and a sixth occurrence will activate a "Decision Day" when an associate can either be fired or put on a year-long trial period where they can be fired for any infraction and promotions are not allowed.
Wal-Mart employees who call in sick don't get a sick day on their first day off, although they can use a vacation or personal day, meaning they won't be paid for that first sick day, according to a New York Times story. The policy is meant to keep workers who aren't actually sick from taking a day off.
The policy is leading to Wal-Mart employees coming in to work sick all of the time, according to the NLC.
The irony there is thick because this summer Wal-Mart offered to help the U.S. Centers for Disease Control give H1N1 virus inoculations at its stores.
On its Web site's frequently asked questions about swine flu, Wal-Mart says to follow the CDC recommendations and stay home for at least 24 hours after your fever is gone except to get medical care or for other necessities.
"Stay away from others as much as possible to keep from making others sick," the Wal-Mart site recommends. "Staying at home means that you should not leave your home except to seek medical care. This means normal activities, including work, school, travel, shopping, social events and public gatherings."
You'll notice that staying away from work was included in that list.
Wal-Mart told the New York Times that it has policies to make it easy for its workers to stay home sick, and that it insists that workers with H1N1 stay home.
But with 39% of private sector workers not having paid sick leave, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, it's a reality that millions of Americans have to face any morning when they wake up sick: Stay home without pay and hopefully get better, or go to work, get paid and remain sick?
It's a tough call when you have bills to pay, but businesses that promote staying home if you're sick shouldn't hang the possibility of being fired over a worker's head for having to make that difficult decision.
Aaron Crowe is a freelance journalist in the San Francisco Bay Area who can be reached at www.AaronCrowe.net



Reader Comments (Page 14 of 15)
11-06-2009 @ 7:36PM
connie said...
I also work for a company that will fire an employee if the employee calls in more than 3 x's in a 3 month time frame. I also have been at work surrounded by sick people which in turn caused me to get sick and come to work sick because I was afraid I'd get fired.
Reply
11-06-2009 @ 7:38PM
Aladames said...
That is not the only policy Walmart has against it's employees, if they have accidents at work they can also get fired, I personally know of at least three cases where people has been written up because they fell(like you want to hurt yourself) or people that keeps quiet and do not report it afraid they might loose their jobs
Reply
11-06-2009 @ 7:38PM
Tony said...
As much as I can't stand Wal-Mart I'd say this is a widespread thing and not something they alone do. Most places I've worked had similar systems in places so people are always working sick and infecting the rest of the staff.
Reply
11-06-2009 @ 7:43PM
BOOWAH said...
The business where I found a job after my 35 year service at one that relocated to Mexico ended, generated a memo. The correspondence stated that the weather would no longer be considered an excuse for not making it to work. In addition the letter stated that should we make it to work, it would be our responsibility to clear away the snow, physical limitations not withstanding. Needless to say, this presented a formidible challenge for a 60 year old. This was back when employment was full. I'd hate to see what's coming now!
Reply
11-07-2009 @ 9:22AM
Bruno said...
I swear the lack of COMMON SENSE and CORPORATE GREED will be the downfall of our nation. Walmart's attitude toward their employees' health status is one thing but their total disregard for the well-being of their customer's stinks.
Reply
11-06-2009 @ 8:14PM
Rick Edwards said...
Wal-Mart needs 2 hurry up and go by by. All good things come 2 an end sooner or later.
Reply
11-06-2009 @ 7:48PM
John padrick murry said...
i have heard a lot of stories about wal mart and how the treat thier emplyees.Bad stories i heard they are hard to work i know this i had friends who worked there.
Reply
11-08-2009 @ 5:51PM
KentuckyBlue said...
My cousin works at Wheaton College in Massachusetts. They are doing the same thing. They tell employees to stay home but then the employee gets in trouble for being out sick!
These places are making it look like they care.
Bottom line is...they don't care.
If the President has declared a national emergency, it should be against the law for employers to do this.
Reply
11-06-2009 @ 7:51PM
RN said...
At the hospital I work at, we get 3 days per year, if you are sick more than that you use your vacation time..so what happens...we go to work sick. We also can be terminated for calling in sick, termination after 6 times. I see people running for the bathroom, throwing up in garbage cans, coughing, sneezing, fevers, you name it. You come to work.Doctors are worse off , they get no sick leave, not 1 day. If you have to go the ER it will cost you over 100.00, thats our co-pay, so we don't do that either. They offered the flu shots but once again if you get sick , you can't afford to take the time off or go to the doctor.Walmart isn't so different from other companies.
Reply
11-06-2009 @ 7:52PM
bem179 said...
Walmart is clever like a fox; they figure if they can appear to be altruistic by providing low prices, and condoning to charitable causes, their "slavery tactics" and non-compliant employee regulation violations go un-checked. They're also taking advantage of the fact that jobs are hard to come by and these people will do whatever they have to do, to keep their jobs. They know just how far to go, and what to do to stay under the radar. They've been operating like this for a long time. Unfortunately, because people are in such dire straits, we can't afford to "boy-cott" the stores, but there should be some regulatory entity that should step in, it's a shame we can't seem to get the proper attention going in that direction... in the olden days, people might have been revolting and picketing a store like this. We just don't seem to have the time or the gumption to do what it takes to get these businesses (and banks) to do the right thing these days, until it's too late.
Reply
11-06-2009 @ 7:58PM
Bev said...
I know for a fact that this article is not entirely true. If you know that you have swine flu, you can take a "LOA" or Leave of Absence. What this does is secure your position and keep you from tallying up absences. It is true that you can't use sick time for the first day though, but for however long you need to be out on LOA past that first day, you can use your sick time that you've acquired. I really don't see anything wrong with the policy considering Wal-Mart is a business and they need their employees as much, as their customers, to continue their business. I know at my work place people call in all the time just because they don't feel like coming in and it makes things difficult for all of the staff and lowers the moral.
Reply
11-20-2009 @ 9:40PM
henry263 said...
well here we go again lets say that unions are the source of our troubles. but let me make one point Walmart can and does fire people for any infraction they can especially lately They are cutting employees that are full time and ones that were hired in with too high of a starting wage I know I work there AND AM WATCHING IT HAPPEN TO ALL THE EMPLOYEES THAT WERE HIRED MORE THAN 3 YEARS AGO. We need protection from Walmart
Reply
11-06-2009 @ 8:03PM
rsandy25 said...
I WORKED FOR A MAJOR CORPORATION IN THE50'S, 60'S 70'S AND AND 80'S. I AGREE WITH WALMART. MOST WHO CALL IN SICK ARE NOT TOO SICK TO COME TO WORK. RULES NEED TO APPLY TO THOSE WHO ONLY FEINT ILLNESS WHEN THEY DON'T WANT TO GO TO WORK. THE COMPANY THAT I WORKED FOR HAS BEEN VERY SUCCESSFUL OVER THE PAST YEASRS. WE FIRED THOSE WHO PUT THE WAY THEY FELT ABOVE THEIR JOBS.
GOOD FOR WALMART.
Reply
11-06-2009 @ 8:09PM
jim said...
Another fine reason to stay out of Walmart. I wonder if a real good lawyer could make me rich for getting swine flu at Walmart when coming into contact with sick employees who were too frightened to take a sick day for fear of losing their jobs???? Almost makes me want to get sick. HHmmmmmm.
Reply
11-06-2009 @ 8:11PM
Joyce said...
I was a retail manager for years. If I would have ever run my store the way Walmart's are run, I would have had customers walking out without purchasing anything. I can not understand why people continue to use Walmart's. Every time you look in the news they are doing or have done something outrageous. If I am sick, I am not going to work. You will run the risk of giving everyone you come in contact with whatever illness you have. Especially if you are handling the money and merchandise. If I see a cashier wiping or blowing their nose I go to another line. I refuse to use self-serve because that's a persons job lost. I feel for the elderly and the young who are exposed to disease daily by workers who don't stay home. Health care reform should start with reforming the attitude of companies towards people staying home sick.
Reply
11-06-2009 @ 8:31PM
grossness54 said...
Joyce, I'm with you! By the way, I happen to be a physician, and I've long ago lost count of the number of people I've seen who were forced to work sick until they got very sick - as in pneumonia. Some of these unfortunates got fired, anyway. When will this country finally join the civilised world and let people do what they need to do to get well and avoid spreading illness to others, without being punished for it?
11-06-2009 @ 8:11PM
grossness54 said...
And here's the real reason it should be called "swine flu": because it's easily spread by sick-leave policies designed by greedy pigs. And how about a truly appropriate legal response to those who refuse to let an ill worker go home or to hospital, resulting in that worker's death: a charge of voluntary manslaughter? Frankly, companies will keep this up until they see one of their enforcers get hauled off to do some hard prison time. The Greeks have a word for it: pathetic.
Reply
11-06-2009 @ 8:14PM
Janice said...
I think that the point system is stupid. When your sick you need to stay at home. Let the companies have insurance that allows their employees to go to the Dr. , pay a small amount (co-pay) and get a Dr.'s note. This may help with people who really are not sick. Don't punish a good employee because they are sick. That's why Wal-Mart cannot keep good employees.
Reply
11-06-2009 @ 8:16PM
Jeff said...
It's WalMart; enough said. The giant crap hole Americans have created and continue to patronize. I can honestly say that I NEVER shop at a WalMart. And this is just more reason for my cause. I have no problem driving by a WalMart to shop elsewhere. I have done it till now, and will continue to do so.
Reply
11-06-2009 @ 8:52PM
Candy said...
At my Sam's Club you have to have a Doctors note if you call in sick or it is an unexsquised, who can afford to miss work and pay a Doctor visit?
Reply