Reverse mortgages could be the next housing scam
Filed under: Banks, Home, Ripoffs and Scams, Mortgages, Refinancing
My mother-in-law is divorced, newly retired and wants to enjoy her Golden Years. Because she just turned 62 and owns her house, she considered a reverse mortgage to turn her home equity into a steady income stream every month.But after I gave her the highlights of a new report from the National Consumer Law Center (NCLC) that said, in short, reverse mortgages have the potential to start another subprime-style financial crisis, she decided to look elsewhere.
Walletpop's Mitch Lipka posted in July how the FBI issued a warning about reverse mortgages and the number of scam artists eyeing them greedily.
In its 20-page report, the NCLC said it's seeing a rise of the same aggressive marketing tactics that were used in the subprime loan heyday, like brokers convincing seniors to use reverse mortgages to buy other not-so-secure financial products like variable annuities.
What's more, top banks and insurance companies are leading the way in the reverse mortgage market.
"Lenders, including some of the nation's largest banks, view that market as a source of profits that have dried up elsewhere," according to the report. "Mortgage brokers see it as a new source of rich fees."
Wells Fargo was cited as an example of a major player in subprime lending that has now become a leader in the reverse mortgage niche (it originated nearly 20,000 of the 112,000 reverse mortgages originated last year).
The NCLC "Subprime Revisited" report is dense but it's a good, thorough read about the details of reverse mortgages, how they can be abused, and by whom. Check out sections 4, 5 and 6 on pages 5 to 13, or at least read the gray sidebars scattered throughout, with sad stories about seniors who got caught in these scams.
One unfortunate person was Laverne Kidwiler, 86, whose reverse mortgage ended up costing her five times more than she received from it. As the San Francisco Chronicle reports, Kidwiler was getting $500 a month from the $120,000 reverse mortgage on the house she and her deceased husband had bought 60 years ago, but when her family checked on refinancing, they found accruing balances and compounding interest meant she now owed $601,802 to repay the debt.
That's why I sent my mom-in-law that NCLC report to dissuade her. Reverse mortgages are due in full when the borrower dies, and many times his or her family gets sucked into that financial drainpipe, too.
Financial experts generally recommend against reverse mortgages, and advise seniors to take out a home-equity line of credit instead or downsize to a smaller house. The senior advocacy group AARP offers tips on how to handle reverse mortgages.
Still, seniors should prepare themselves for a stream of pitches from mortgage brokers, lenders and others. The week after I sent my mother-in-law the report, she got one e-mail and one direct-mail ad about the wonders of reverse mortgages and what they can do for her.



Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-27-2009 @ 8:16PM
John said...
Wow, you based your discission on a publiciation full of misinformaiton?? I hope you mother doesn't rely on you for all her advice...she may be in for a long retirement
Reply
10-28-2009 @ 9:47AM
Britt said...
Wow John!
Which mortgage company do you work for? LOL
10-28-2009 @ 9:05AM
Ernest said...
If you get a letter in the mail offering you to get any kind of loan against your mortgage my advice to you is throw it in the trash. Only time you want to mess with you mortgage is if you are already taking it up the butt with a high interest rate loan that you got tricked into by a predatory lender.
9 times out of 10 the new loan they are offering is going to cost you more in the long run.
Reply
10-29-2009 @ 8:00PM
Basilio said...
One thing is to listen to people's opinion, and another is to do your research and get your facts before anyone starts bashing a great loan program like reverse mortgage. Why not be realistic and admit you can not help them financially has much has you want to. They have work so hard, for anyone to tell me, they do not deserve to enjoy what they work so hard for. Again unless you are 40 years old and still depending Mom and Dad to support you. Then, maybe will I understand why people like the writer say stupid things like that about this great programs for our American Senior Citizen. Sub Prime did not have a program which the borrower did not have to make a mortgage payment until they died..
What is so bad about this program?
Reply
10-30-2009 @ 10:01AM
Brad said...
My aunt lost her job and couldn't afford to pay her mortgage. Her home was was going to be foreclosed on by the bank. She owed 89k. The property was valued at 250k. She qualified for roughly 175k reverse mortgage. She paid off the mortgage balance and had 86k in available cash as she needed. So tell me...how is this a bad thing again? Vanessa, you shouldn't paint with such a broad brush. Of course, like anything good thing, there will be abuses. Reverse mortgages are not for everyone. But they're absolutely a good thing for some seniors.
Reply
10-30-2009 @ 3:42PM
Vanessa Richardson said...
I'm not slamming the idea of reverse mortgages, but after seeing what happened with subprime mortgages -- and the scammers who promoted them -- anyone getting into them needs to do their homework. Banks and lenders are always looking for the next financial opportunity. Because Boomers are aging and look at reverse mortgages for their needs, this is becoming a prime financial opportunity for banks and lenders -- both good ones and shady ones. The reverse mortgage may be a good fit for you but you need to make sure you pick a lender who makes it work more for your financial situation than for its own.
Reply
11-04-2009 @ 11:54PM
Cliff said...
re: Reverse Mortgages - Any way you look at it, the potential pitfalls can be avoided with careful planning, education and informed decision making. - http://www.allrmc.com
Reply