Ad Rant: Levi's celebrates America the beautiful...with $238 jeans and a greedy treasure hunt
Filed under: Ad Rant
Would you buy a pair of used-looking Levi's jeans from this man?I would.
But I draw the line at using a great ad celebrating the pioneer spirit of America, along with Whitman's stirring words, as a springboard for a crass $100,000 treasure hunt.
For the past few months, Levi's has been piggybacking the poetry of Walt Whitman on its "Go Forth" ad campaign, linking its jeans to the can-do, hard-scrabble, exuberant spirit of early America. It even has Walt himself as its pitchman.
You'd think that would be difficult, given that the poet died in 1892. But, like DNA, MP3s live on forever: There is an original, 36-second wax cylinder recording of what is presumed to be Whitman's voice reading four lines from his poem, America. Levi's cleaned up the soundtrack; you can download the scratchy original here.
His voice is as stirring and passionate as any bootstrapper this country ever produced, as he extols the richness of the American people:
Strong, ample, fair, enduring, capable, rich
Perennial with the Earth, with Freedom, Law and Love
Perennial with the Earth, with Freedom, Law and Love
Watching this ad gives me chills. The good kind.
The black-and-white visuals of New Orleans under siege are both stark and stirring. The people of all ages in this ad are kinetic, alive. They do backflips, ride horses, dance in the spray of fireworks. They are -- yes! -- strong, strong, ample, fair, enduring ... just as Whitman envisioned.
I don't think he envisioned, though, a treasure hunt sponsored by Levi's, whose contest rules limit the game to anyone 18 or older who resides within the 50 states.
In other words, the people who actually make Levi's jeans, in all their outsourced geography, are not eligible to play.
The ad gives the feeling of indefatigable spirit and grassroots revolution. It ends with a kiss, the ultimate sign of hope. Despite the opening image of a hunk of signage in the shape of the word "America," half-submerged in water, the message is that America is unsinkable. It gives hope that we will rebuild, that our past is our future.
It's a noble sentiment. Somehow, I don't feel the same about treasure hunts.
It's clever to link the words of that most American of poets with a brand that's been around since Whitman was in his 50s. (Maybe he even wore them -- despite what one commenter said on YouTube, that Whitman probably wore Gloria Vanderbilts to Studio 54. Hey, if Whitman's voice could survive, not to mention disco, then who's to say the guy's sartorial choices don't reverberate in some ghostly way around the pop-culture universe?)
I like the ad enough that I'm not going to get all righteous about using Whitman to sell jeans costing up to $238, even though he spent his life poor and evidently required barely any more luxuries than Thoreau over at Walden Pond.
It doesn't even bother me (well, it does, but not enough to march on it) that this ad is about America undaunted, rising from the ashes of hard times; yet, during modern hard times, Levi's gradually laid off thousands of workers and closed its last two American plants in 2003. Levi's now manufactures the majority of its clothing in anyplace BUT America. Naturally, that goes against the spirit and intent of Whitman. Not to mention against the spirit of Levi Strauss, the Bavarian immigrant who patented the process of putting rivets in denim, thus inventing jeans.
All of that's true, but here, for me, is the final straw: Levi's has followed up this lyrical, lovely, hope-inspiring campaign with ... a greed-inspired, insipid treasure hunt. (Yes, the winner of the $100,000 prize also gets to choose a charity that will receive $100,000 as well, but that doesn't mollify me.)
Interestingly, the most expensive pair of jeans that Levi's sells -- the Landmine, $238 -- carries that price tag partly because it recreates the worn, faded, torn look that has become so prized in jeans. The Levi's brand originally took off because its workpants were more durable than other clothing of the period, but you spend more today for the look people back then were trying to avoid: wear and tear.
That has been true for a couple of decades now, but it is particularly symbolic in light of the "Go Forth" ad's queasy subtext, that "true" America is about the kind of work and effort it takes to wear out your jeans, when anyone will tell you that most people would rather pay for "the faded look" than do the good, clean work it takes to weather their own clothes.



Reader Comments (Page 1 of 7)
10-23-2009 @ 2:42PM
Mike said...
Amen! You were losing me until you got to the final two paragraphs. I don't really care about the treasure hunt, and I'm becoming inured to the idea of outsourcing. And, I don't mind people wearing worn out jeans; that is when jeans tend to be their most comfortable. But, it disturbs me to the bone that you can buy jeans - at any price - that make it LOOK like you actually work for a living. To pay extra for that fakery nearly incites me to violence.
Reply
10-23-2009 @ 2:29PM
Joseph said...
Levi's was very well lknown around here as they had a mjaor manufacturing plant here that closed down.
Levi's was the Bearer of Great Jeans and Fine Clothes...
With $238 jeans and a greedy treasure hunt...
Welcome to The New Levi's ... Bearer of Corporate Greed.
Reply
10-23-2009 @ 2:40PM
Lynn Dorner said...
I'm from the generation (the 60's and 70's) that took pride in wearing our own jeans to the point where the jeans became faded and maybe torn a bit. Those jeans had status as our "most loved and worn" pants. The jeans were broken in from wear and tear in our daily lives and we were proud to wear those lived-in jeans. I really don't understand the point of buying jeans that are already so torn up that there is barely any fabric left. Most of today's jeans that are sold w/tears already in them have the rips in places that really would not occur in a natural way. I think the look is stupid! And to pay $238 for a pair of already torn up jeans makes no sense to me. It goes against the whole idea of wearing your favorite jeans to the point of fading and tears.
Reply
10-26-2009 @ 9:08AM
ettu said...
Todays' jeans will never have the character of those from days gone by. Young people think they can have instant everything, but there are no memories to go along with the "ready worn and torn" jeans they buy, and pay 5 times as much for them. Sigh
10-26-2009 @ 1:26PM
littlemissr17 said...
Thanks very much, ettu, but not all of us are all instant gratification, all the time. I know it's hard to believe, but some of us wait, save and plan for both the little luxuries we want and for our future. As for torn jeans? Not all of us wear those, either. I buy reasonably-priced, intact jeans and if they get a few holes in them well wearing them, that's what a needle and thread is for.
10-23-2009 @ 2:39PM
gr8bsn said...
Why would I spend $200 on a pair of Levis when I can go to Wal Mart for Dickie's jeans that cost under $20? They are made for work, so they last longer and they're more comfortable. Old Navy jeans are decent for the money too.
Reply
10-26-2009 @ 8:26AM
Elizabeth Rydan said...
I agree. I always counted on Levi to be affordable. At $200..not anymore. Walt left 'beautiful' and 'skinny' out of his narrative. This isn't real life. Only people who are overly consumed with keeping up with the Jones' will spend the kind of money. I've got kids to feed.
10-23-2009 @ 2:51PM
Joe B said...
It's nice to know that Levies is celebrating America and the American spirit with jeans that are no longer made in this country good going greedy greedy people is all it is. Next time get it right and celebrate Malaysia, and China where you employ the people that make them.
Reply
10-23-2009 @ 3:41PM
RCW said...
Would not purchase Levi jeans, for any price. Traitors!!!!
Reply
10-26-2009 @ 11:21AM
Stand Firm said...
I agree, I have vowed (boycotted) and have not purchased any Levi's product since they closed the last manufacturing plant in the USA. Imagine an American company that was started by early pioneers making tent cloth for American settlers and now all they want is our $$ to ship overseas to grow someone else's economy while draining our own. I did the same thing with Citgo (get all their Gas from a communist regime). We need to take a stand!
10-23-2009 @ 2:58PM
Alex C said...
I can't understand why people think businesses are indebted to supply Americans and only Americas with jobs. The rest of the world is catching up with us as far as labor ability and for some reason we think its wrong. Companies need to outsource or die, our labor prices do not compete well in a lot of cases with the rest of the world. If garment makers from other countries will use cheaper labor and if the American companies don't, the American companies won't be around much longer.
And yes, 200 bucks is a lot for jeans. But what exemplifies the american spirit more than a small company that no doubt probably had its hardship and failures. But, it lives on for many decades and becomes an icon of the american spirit, even the spirit of excess and privilege .....we have to take the good and the bad.
Reply
10-23-2009 @ 5:01PM
Anne said...
Excellent! You hit the nail on the head and all were valid points. People need to get real and realize that for the moment, we still live in a "free-market" society. Thanks!
10-23-2009 @ 4:47PM
adgirl said...
The irony that has apparently escaped you is the fact that Levi's is branding itself as all-American company and the campaign is touting the American spirit. Meanwhile, Levis are made overseas. Levis can employ whomever they want, but to tout this "American Anthem" campaign and ignore that it doesn't even employ Americans in their product's fabrication is pretty pathetic.
10-23-2009 @ 4:55PM
robert said...
its fools like you who have made america weak and for levi to try this ad is an joke let the people where levis are made wear them I wont americans who think like you are just as stupid its time for the people who love this country to take it back from the crooks and put working class people running this country again
10-23-2009 @ 6:08PM
jeff said...
How stupid are you? How do you compete with nations whose minimum wage is 10 cents an hour. Please explain. Maybe all of the CEO's of these companies should live in the third world countries where their fortunes are made instead of their gated country club neighborhoods.
10-23-2009 @ 9:16PM
rollingfrogmusic said...
Levis are now made overseas because it makes no damned sense to pay union garment workers more than ICU nurses, which is what they seem to expect here in the US. I don't like seeing jobs move overseas but I certainly understand how and why it happens, and more often than not the unions have themselves to thank for it.
Think about it. You always buy your bread at the corner store for $5 a loaf and you've never shopped elsewhere. Then one day you ask a friend to pick up some bread on his way over to watch the game, he's getting beer anyway. You notice the price tag says &1.99 for the same bread, bought at Kroger. All of a sudden you realize that the nice, friendly, old lady that owns the corner store doesn't always seem to be smiling for the reasons you originally thought. She just loves shoving it up your ass.
Maybe we can get our new Marxist President to appoint a jeans czar who can make all the union members wear Levis to work. Now, that would be funny.
10-23-2009 @ 3:03PM
anna said...
i felt these ad were in present in very poor taste so bad i will no longer puschase any levi products
Reply
10-23-2009 @ 3:06PM
Ted T said...
"Go Forth" ??? Yeah, go forth and find a manufacturer that uses American (born) labor. We're making the rest of the world rich while we experience double-digit unemployment. When YOU have no job, try and make your payments on that Toyota.
Reply
10-23-2009 @ 7:31PM
Alex C said...
That's really fine, Toyota is the most "american" car company around. They have plants here you know, along with BMW and Subaru to name a few
10-23-2009 @ 8:07PM
watdafuk said...
Yea except there is a difference between Made in America , and assembled in America.