- IT'S ON: Behind the War Between Obama & Big Biz - FORTUNE
- TOUGH BREAK: Toyota Recalls 400K Cars Over Steering Issue - CNNMoney
- 'SPILLIONAIRES': Who's Set to Profit From the BP Oil Spill? - Huffington Post
- BANG PER BUCK: The Most Efficient Companies on the Planet - The Motley Fool
- NO MORE COACH POTATOES: Gadgets to Take TV on the Go - FOX Business
- THE PULSE: Economic Signals From Cereal & Toothpaste - CNBC
- WHAT NOT TO WEAR: 10 Office Fashion Don'ts - Forbes
- IT'S ON: Behind the War Between Obama & Big Biz - FORTUNE
- TOUGH BREAK: Toyota Recalls 400K Cars Over Steering Issue - CNNMoney
- 'SPILLIONAIRES': Who's Set to Profit From the BP Oil Spill? - Huffington Post
- BANG PER BUCK: The Most Efficient Companies on the Planet - The Motley Fool
- NO MORE COACH POTATOES: Gadgets to Take TV on the Go - FOX Business
- THE PULSE: Economic Signals From Cereal & Toothpaste - CNBC
- WHAT NOT TO WEAR: 10 Office Fashion Don'ts - Forbes

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 5)
9-22-2009 @ 2:37PM
Brian said...
"It isn't easy for companies to comply with the law" Are you kidding me? I went to the internet and in under five minutes I found a company that will test a food product and provide the required nutritional analysis for $125. Any company found to be off by more than 10% in its lable vs content should be made to remove all of its falsely packaged products from the market. That should provide more of an incentive to comply with the law.
Reply
9-22-2009 @ 3:35PM
barbyk said...
the horror is the situation this places on folks with allergies. I have to depend on these labels...
I have oftened wondered how accurate they are ----scary
9-22-2009 @ 6:24PM
JBICRS said...
Testing for every single thing that is on a nutrition label costs more than $125. Any lab that claims that they can do all of the testing for that amount of money is not legitimate.
9-22-2009 @ 6:46PM
Rob said...
Brian is right, I sold food packaging for 20 years and there was not much attention paid to changes in formulations of many products. The problem is food manufacturers change ingredient suppliers often and the levels of sugar, salt and fats are the most likely to be impacted. The problem for the food manufacturer is they sometimes purchase millions of dollars worth of packaging at one time to be cost effective. Imagine if you had to trash this amount of packaging every time your ingredient levels varied 5 or 10%. Food manufacturing and ingredient levels are not an exact science in the quantities most of them produce in.
Hope that sheds some light, the food manufacturers are really not the bad guys.
9-22-2009 @ 11:48PM
Poindexter said...
The label examples are actually quite telling for those items mentioned. If you are buying them, you probably do not give a crap about your diet anyway. Coconut pie: As fattening as you can get, even without sugar. Sugar free syrup: For your carbo packed pancakes or waffles? Sugar in Apple Walnut Muffins: Look at the fat content in those and why even worry about the sugar (unless you are diabetic, then you probably should not eat a whole one anyway). Fat exceeding labels in hamburger buns: As if you are eating fat-free hamburgers? Sugar content in Prune Juice: Every fruit juice is super high in sugars.
THE SOLUTION: Keep it simple and make it yourself. Eat less. By consuming fewer total calories you will not have to worry so much about proportions of fat and sugar. Go for foods with high protein content. Skipping a meal is not bad for you as is so often misstated. It is a great way to burn your reserves and lose body fat over time without a lot of suffering. It also COSTS LESS to EAT LESS and to make it yourself from scratch, knowing what is actually in your food.
9-22-2009 @ 7:13PM
Michael gifford said...
what a great opportunity for jobs...the FDA should be hiring and training like crazy....
Reply
9-22-2009 @ 5:45PM
whizzybo said...
But the voters always want to hear smaller government, less regulation ("government on the backs of business"), lower taxes, etc. without realizing the connection between regulation and protection.
9-22-2009 @ 4:41PM
lisa m. said...
The truth is that the FDA is like any other govt agency: they are plied with incentives by lobbyists. For instance, the USA's soy lobby is one of our most powerful ones. Years ago, they prevailed upon the FDA to allow them to disguise MSG (usually made from soy) in foods by calling it "spices", flavoring, or...gotta love this "NATURAL FLAVORING". Since when is MSG natural?
I am dismayed but not surprised by this article's contents. As usual, it leads back to a lack of accountability in the way things are done in this country.
Reply
9-22-2009 @ 3:09PM
lisa said...
You are so correct. If we can't hold the FDA (FOOD and DRUG Administration) accountable, then who? Since they are so overwhelmed and understaffed (what a cop-out!) and can not do their job properly, then why do we continue to pour money into a defunk orginization?
2-06-2010 @ 3:19AM
stan said...
Actually MSG can be found naturally occuring in some foods. We even have independent taste receptors for its flavor, "umami", on our tongues!
9-22-2009 @ 4:22PM
D said...
Not only have they wanted to call MSG something else, they also spell it out as monosodium glutamate on the ingredients lists so that people who aren't aware of the full name don't know they're eating MSG additives
9-22-2009 @ 6:42PM
Bill said...
I fully agree. Couldn't have said it better myself.
9-22-2009 @ 2:48PM
fwest32 said...
The manufacturer should pay for the tests periodically at an independent lab.
Reply
9-22-2009 @ 3:28PM
Jaclyn Rothenberg said...
Shaklee Corporation, 300 natural products.....300 controlled test, 83,000 a year............compared to other companies 1-2 a year.............it is a joke what is going on with products, supplements so forth........fda is a joke we must be our very own advocate.....google shaklee and see what you find.
been using products for 16 years, quality
9-22-2009 @ 2:52PM
FreedomIsNotFree said...
Let's see if I have this right - you expect an admin that approves all the chemical drugs and regularly has to recall them because of all the damage they are doing, including deaths - you expect them to take more responsibility to police companies that provide ready prepared food and snacks? Is this part of this admins takeover of all the private companies, now that they own banks and car companies? Be careful... they might be more likely to put snack and supplement cos out of business in favor of drugs.
Reply
9-22-2009 @ 2:58PM
Brenda said...
This truly explains alot, for instance, I have had gastric bypass surgery and with that surgery we are not supposed to have any or very little sugar, and I follow those guide lines very strickly because the sugar makes me ill, as in, pass out ill, and it is a shame that these labels are inaccurate. This could be deadly to me or even to others if I was driving and caused a accident. They should be challenged, many have sued for less, like sueing for hot coffee when coffee is always hot, to me this seems like a huge problem.
Reply
9-22-2009 @ 3:03PM
Kathy said...
This is very discouraging to me as I just found out that I have diabetes. The carb values need to be right to control my sugar levels. Now I have to second guess the values. And you want the government to run Healthcare - give me a break
Reply
9-22-2009 @ 3:31PM
jaclyn said...
Kathy,
Please explain what you mean when you say government will run healthcare.....details please
9-22-2009 @ 3:56PM
repukeslie7 said...
Sweetie, these labels are being printed by FOR PROFIT businesses, not the government. They want to make a profit and don't give a damn about you. Do you want a CEO who expects a$1.6 BILLION paycheck, like United Healthcare's Bill McGuire making your healthcare decisions? Not me - been there, done that, almost died when treatment was denied. I'll take the government any day over that.
9-22-2009 @ 3:06PM
weelseee said...
2 out of 3 researchers make up their results. Don't believe everything you read!!!
Reply