Why the tanking market makes real estate a good investment
Filed under: Real Estate
With home prices in the toilet, more than a few financial journalists and pundits have lined up to write the eulogy for single family homes as an investment.In the Wall Street Journal, M.P. McQueen writes (subscription required) "While sales of low-cost housing are picking up, for many, a house is back to what it traditionally was: a long-term financial commitment, a sturdy shelter and a place to hang your hat." According to McQueen, "housing prices have turned homes into shelters, not investments."
Meanwhile, over at CBS MoneyWatch, Barbara Bedway writes that "Real estate is illiquid, and unlike a stock and bond portfolio, which can be sold piecemeal to raise a little cash, you can't sell half a house. Historically, real estate was an income generator - if the rental revenue exceeded the carrying cost, it was a good investment; if not, it wasn't. Once prices started rising 20 percent a year, the old rules were forgotten, and it seemed as if capital gains would go on forever."
Bedway's point is a good one: Real estate is most viable as an investment when carrying costs (mortgage, taxes, maintenance, and insurance) are less than the amount the property could be rented for. But here's the thing: The rate of decline in home values compared with flat rental prices in most areas and low interest rates has made homes better from a cash flow perspective than they have been in a long time. A recent Associated Press analysis of 45 metro areas found that the difference between the median rent and the median mortgage payment has fallen by a stunning $556 over the past three years: from $777 to $221. When you consider that most owner-occupied homes are bigger than most rental properties, it's clear that in many areas owning is actually cheaper than renting on lower-end, well-selected properties.
But what of McQueen's warning that a home is no longer an investment? It's total bull. Real estate and the stock market are two of the only products that most people find less attractive when they go on sale. The decline in real estate values makes a house a better investment than it's been in a long time.




Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-14-2009 @ 7:47PM
jgarner3999 said...
Single Family homes were probably NEVER a good investment. I always have been told, by my father, who I admire for his investing wisdom, that homes are a method of "forced savings."
With the tax burdens, the potential pitfalls of catching interests rates at the wrong time, maintenance, it's a wonder why people believe their homes are their best investment.
But savings money is a good thing for 99% of the population, that is why real estate, technically, is a good investment - but not a financial one. I believe it is a good investment for the meaning of a person or a family as well as a learning mechanism for people to learn about how large amounts of money are managed (a home is usually the most valuable piece of property an individual will ever own).
Why it seems a bank will give you a 30-year loan to purchase one investment (say, a $300,000 loan) like a house, based off of not very much income, and not that much for probably more secure investments baffles me. But owning instead of renting ones home is part of the American Dream, a dream that will never and must never, ever die!
Reply
9-22-2009 @ 10:05PM
Dean Otis said...
I think tanking market makes real estate a REALLY VERY good investment. I've been doing some work of this topic, I've found this site: Yellow documents, there're some documents of real state and business things that gives a better "picture" of this.
Reply