Why restrict Cash For Clunkers to auto industry?
Filed under: Transportation, Recession, Stimulate US, Insurance-car
Lost in the gloating over car sales figures tied to the Cash For Clunkers program is the original intention -- to help clean up the environment by purging the roads of exhaust-belching jalopies. Instead, the legislation has become a handout to the auto industry, or, more accurately, another handout to the auto industry.
The short-term stimulation to the market only demonstrates the most intractable problem facing the auto industry; its cars run are too good, so we don't need as many as it produces. When the vehicles it builds will run for 15 years and 200,000 miles +, how can they convince people to give them up early?
These clunker drivers apparently are willing to drive cars for a long, long time, and now that they have new cars, you can cross them off the customer list until 2025 or so.
If we intend to use such programs to both improve the environment and boost retail sales, perhaps we should spread the wealth around.
Rather than drop another $2 billion gift on the car industry, how about a "Cash for Clunker Refrigerators" program that replaces inefficient, freon-eating monsters with new energy star models?
Or expand the "Cash For Clunkers" program to include motorcycles? Taking two-strokes machines off the trails would be a big improvement to our air quality.
The powerboat industry, the motor home manufacturers and retailers, school bus builders, lawnmower retailers, and many other industries could use the help of such a program, and offer ways to replace polluting products with ones much friendlier to the environment.
Haven't we dumped enough money into the auto industry? There are a lot of other workers around the country that could use a stimulus boost, if the administration is determined to drop another $2 billion into the pool.
If you're interested in transportation, you may like
these related sites for: Maps, Driving Directions, Travel, and Cars.
Subscribe to Walletpopthese related sites for: Maps, Driving Directions, Travel, and Cars.



Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-03-2009 @ 3:05PM
linda fritsch said...
very disappointed in the program. my daughter has a 79 oldsmobile that we would love to replace. is this not a clunker --according to the gov-- no. parts are getting hard to find -- tradein value sucks -- thought program would help situations like this.
Reply
8-03-2009 @ 3:45PM
Daniel said...
The most insidious part about singling out the automobile industry is the fact that it actually has direct competitors that will be hit hard by this: other modes of transportation. Transit, bicycling, walking are all more energy-efficient ways of getting around that will be losing a share of transportation because of this bill. It's as I've the Feds poured all of their "magic money" into Coca-cola, while leaving Pepsi out to dry.
This bill stopped being about the environment months ago, if it ever was.
Reply
8-03-2009 @ 5:30PM
fern said...
That's actually an excellent idea.
Reply
8-03-2009 @ 9:02PM
tjukuk said...
they should have also restricted the cash for clunkers to cars made by ford/ chevrolet/ gm. oops sorry no foreign cars allowed. Keep the cash here.
Reply
8-04-2009 @ 8:25AM
robrtl said...
clunker clone caper
With the clunker program so wildly successful, why shouldn't it be expanded. Congress could offer exchanges of energy inefficent hot water heaters, clothes dryers, washing machines, refrigerators, microwave ovens and electric toothbrushes. Think of the jobs that would would be created and the jobs created destroying these old servicable, but energy hog appliances. Of course the jobs would all vanish when government money was exhausted.
Reply