Skip to Content

A $15,000 homebuyer tax credit? For everyone?

More
Text SizeAAA

Filed under: Real Estate

Having already thrown the kitchen sink at housing without promoting the kind of stability they had hoped, our elected officials are now heading into the bathroom to grab the toilet.

Senator Johnny Isakson, a Georgia Republican and retired real estate broker, introduced a bill today that would raise the homebuyer tax credit to $15,000 and make it available to all buyers, regardless of income. Connecticut Democrat Chris Dodd is co-sponsoring the bill

"One of the biggest problems facing the American people today is an illiquid housing market, a decline in their equity, a decline in their net worth and a depression in the housing market that we are obligated to correct if we possibly can," Isakson said in a statement.

The problem with a tax credit that is available to everyone is that it will simply raise the price of homes -- effectively funneling cash from the federal government -- which is broke -- into the pockets of home sellers. If everyone who wants to buy a home now saves $15,000 on their taxes by buying a home, it will just drive up prices.

First-time home buyer tax credits might be defensible on the grounds that they give young people with limited resources a shot at the American Dream. But if everyone gets the tax credit, it starts to look like people who buy homes will be benefiting at the expense of everyone else, who will now have to share in picking up the tax burden abdicated by homebuyers.

The other problem with this bill is that it could have the effect of stifling the housing recovery for the rest of the year. The current $8,000 first-time homebuyer tax credit expires on December 31, and think about it: If this bill is going to pass, who would be dumb enough to buy a home before it goes into effect, since it explicitly states that it won't be applied retroactively?

The problem is that the real estate industry is the fourth largest campaign contributor in the country, so whatever they want, they'll probably get. It could spur some trade-up activity as people sell smaller homes to buy bigger ones -- and what could possibly be better for Realtors than that? Double the commissions, double the fun!

It's just unclear to me why the United States government should have to underwrite this pathetic prop-up effort.
Subscribe to Walletpop

Mortgage Basics

Featured Partner

What is Your Home Worth?



Zac Bissonnette
Zac Bissonnette Filed under: Money College, Saving Money, Student Loans

Sallie Mae says pay interest on a private student loan while in college? Not smart

The College on a Dime series is written by Zac Bissonnette, a junior at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. His book College On a Dime will be published by Penguin in the fall. In a press ...
Katie Rogers
Katie Rogers Filed under: Money College, Technology, Career

Twitter etiquette that could land you a job

More than two years after joining Twitter, I still find myself the target of blank stares more often than I'd like to admit. When it comes to skepticism, I've heard just about anything you can ...
Sean Powell
Sean Powell Filed under: Charity

5 quick tips for smart charitable giving

Charitable giving is ingrained in our culture. Americans as a percentage of gross domestic product give more than any other country. And as a result of this charitable inclination, the Chronicle of ...
Jennifer Oldham
Jennifer Oldham Filed under: Food, Travel, In the News

Continental stops serving free meals on flights under six hours

With its competitors doing away with free food in economy years ago, it's a wonder that Continental Airlines didn't drop the perk earlier. But the last airline to offer free meals to passengers on ...

FanHouse NCAA Tournament Bracket Challenge

Headlines from WalletPop Partners