A Kodak moment will now cost you at least $4.99
Filed under: Home, Technology, Travel
I have a friend who takes a prolific amount of digital photos on every vacation, then sends her friends a link to KodakGallery.com, where her photo album is stored. She just got back from Australia and kindly sent me a link to her latest album -- a total of 382 photos, totally uncategorized. Gee thanks, but do I really need to scroll through the slideshow of 10 photos of Sydney's train station alone and 20 photos of her and her boyfriend snuggling on the snorkeling boat? (I never even made it to the second half of her trip).
However, after I clicked off her album, Kodak Gallery sent me an e-mail titled 'Our storage policy has changed.' Now, members with photo storage of up to 2 gigabytes or more must make annual purchases of at least $5, and those with photos totaling more than 2 GB worth must buy at least $20 of annual minimum purchases. Kodak told me I was 'currently compliant with our new policy,' (because I don't have any photos there) but customers who signed up before the crackdown don't get a free pass. I hope my friend has backed up her photos because, according to the Associated Press, Kodak will delete freeloaders' photo albums on May 16 if they don't pay up.
Kodak Gallery, formerly known as Ofoto, told AP it wants to focus on its best (i.e., paying) customers, not folks who just want free picture storage. For now, it is one of the few charging a fee. (AOL ended its photo-storage site earlier this year and transferred images to American Greetings Corp.'s PhotoWorks, which also has a pay-an-annual-fee-or-we'll-delete-your-photos policy). Other photo sites like Google's Picasa and Yahoo's Flickr still offer free uploads, albeit with storage limits, but don't be surprised if they follow in Kodak Gallery's footsteps as more companies these days realize 'free content' isn't earning them any money.
So it's best to back up your photos on your own computer instead of just keeping them all on some company's web site. Also, ask friends and families to send their JPEGs to you directly instead of swapping them on a third-party web site. The AP story profiled Vanessa Daniele, who has multiple albums on Kodak Gallery, many with photos taken by friends and family who uploaded them to the site directly. She doesn't have those copies stored so those images will be deleted even if she makes the new required minimum purchase. To hold on to those photos, she'll either have to pay a $25 annual subscription to download high-resolution versions of the images, or pay $20 plus shipping to get a 200-picture CD from Kodak Gallery and upload them somewhere else. Makes looking at those family vacation photos a little less pleasing, doesn't it?
Kodak Gallery, formerly known as Ofoto, told AP it wants to focus on its best (i.e., paying) customers, not folks who just want free picture storage. For now, it is one of the few charging a fee. (AOL ended its photo-storage site earlier this year and transferred images to American Greetings Corp.'s PhotoWorks, which also has a pay-an-annual-fee-or-we'll-delete-your-photos policy). Other photo sites like Google's Picasa and Yahoo's Flickr still offer free uploads, albeit with storage limits, but don't be surprised if they follow in Kodak Gallery's footsteps as more companies these days realize 'free content' isn't earning them any money.
So it's best to back up your photos on your own computer instead of just keeping them all on some company's web site. Also, ask friends and families to send their JPEGs to you directly instead of swapping them on a third-party web site. The AP story profiled Vanessa Daniele, who has multiple albums on Kodak Gallery, many with photos taken by friends and family who uploaded them to the site directly. She doesn't have those copies stored so those images will be deleted even if she makes the new required minimum purchase. To hold on to those photos, she'll either have to pay a $25 annual subscription to download high-resolution versions of the images, or pay $20 plus shipping to get a 200-picture CD from Kodak Gallery and upload them somewhere else. Makes looking at those family vacation photos a little less pleasing, doesn't it?




Reader Comments (Page 1 of 7)
4-03-2009 @ 7:29AM
farside62 said...
seems fair to me.
Reply
4-04-2009 @ 7:10AM
Dudley Haas (Wacko, Taxes) said...
I can tell this is the holy season of Lent. My shirts and jacket are all dusty!
4-04-2009 @ 10:03AM
charlotte said...
The policy of Kodak and others who follow suit is not unfair -- a couple of points from a photo lab owner:
1. Just because you use a site for free, does not mean it doesn't cost someone something somewhere -- companies are in business to MAKE money -- the same reason you go to work every day. They don't have to give things for free - be happy it was free for a long time and now available for a small fee
2. PLEASE don't store your photos on your camera cards OR your computers!!! I know from customes coming in the store very well that computers crash and camera cards get corrupted. I have seen many tears in my store because their once in a life time trip photos are GONE!! Take them OFF your camera card and leave it free for the next event. Put them on your computer if you want, but store them onCD's and put them away. So if/when something happens to your computer, you have a back up. Also - consider PRINTING them! Technology changes so quickly -- and you can't sit next to grandma with the computer between you -- you need to have them in an album. Consider Katrina -- you are running out of the house to escape the flood with things you can't live with out -- are you really going to scoop up your computer >??? Isn't it more likely that you will be able to carry an album or a box of photos???
3. Even if you find another hosting site for free -- remember that their site could fail at any time -- remember all the stores who had people hack in and get credit card numbers?? Hackers or a worm could bring down their site and your stuff is GONE!!!
5-28-2009 @ 9:48AM
DigiDeena said...
Vanessa & Charlotte, You are both right on target when you talk about taking responsibility for backing up your own pictures and printing them. Too often, with all the technology available, people gravitate to the conveniences of these photo sharing sites, and neglect to have a Plan B for their photos (which really should be Plan A). YOU always want to be in control of YOUR photos so that due to issues beyond your control--sites closing, computer hard drives crashing, media & format obsolescence, etc--you don't lose your precious photos. I highly recommend making digital photo books of your photos so you have a primary copy if all else fails, and then you can share the completed book online with family & friends, too. This is more fun and meaningful than scrolling through the 300+ vacation photos your friends share with you, which have no context or no story behind them. And years down the line when you are retired in your rocking chair, you'll actually have a printed book to look at, rather than squinting at a computer screen. I'm in the business of helping people preserve their photos & memories, so this topic is close to my heart!
4-03-2009 @ 7:58AM
haarr@aol.com said...
It truly is a shame. I have used this site for years. There are many other free options out there and I will be using them instead. Sorry Kodak...loved working with you and using your site.
Reply
4-03-2009 @ 8:18AM
Karlin said...
I agree totally! I have used this site since my grandkids were born and all my pictures are there. What a shame!
4-03-2009 @ 12:06PM
Am_verde09 said...
you can go to www.photobucket.com and put your photos there
4-05-2009 @ 4:51PM
jason said...
What do you mean "working with you'. They want 5 bucks of business a year. Obviously you're not working with them at all. 5 bucks? 20? a year. What a bunch of cheapos.
4-03-2009 @ 8:42AM
tom said...
or you could just store the pics on your computer, you don't even need Kodak Eashyshare. ``
Reply
4-03-2009 @ 8:29AM
Audrey said...
I don't see what all the fuss is about. Isn't that what memory cards are for, that's where all my pics are stored.
Reply
4-03-2009 @ 11:32AM
Sandra said...
$4.99 a year is reasonable.It lets Kodak who is interested.I never heard of this site.I use a picture hosting site and I pay $5.00 a month.
Reply
4-03-2009 @ 8:30AM
chuck said...
How is that not fair? They don't HAVE to host your files for you. And they're giving you 2 gigs for free. That sounds right.
Reply
4-04-2009 @ 11:08AM
Tracy said...
I agree that we don't need to free load off of Kodak. They have provided free storage for many years and in these hard economic times a small fee for storage space per customer isn't a lot to ask.
4-03-2009 @ 8:33AM
Jan said...
I've used this site for a long time now! I think it's a shame that they gonna start charging you to use their site! You buy their cameras and use them I think it is unfair that they are doin this. Will look for another site to store pictures.
Reply
4-03-2009 @ 8:39AM
LokisDragonKitty said...
I don't believe it is right. I received my first Kodak camera as a gift this year, now find I MUST spend money I cannot spend or they will delete my photos. Thank God I have them stored! Boo, Kodak, hiss!!!
Reply
4-03-2009 @ 1:40PM
terri said...
ya i agree i took all my pics from my kodak acct and put them in photobucket bo kodak bye bye kodak!!!!
4-03-2009 @ 9:18AM
Heidi said...
I have used Kodak for years, bought 3 cameras and all my prints and ..... one day all my pics were gone without notice! I haven't used them since.
Reply
4-03-2009 @ 8:45AM
Ralph said...
You know, you can save pictures on your hard drive for FREE. Kodak must be desperate for money...
Reply
4-03-2009 @ 8:47AM
J. Hindman said...
I cannot believe folks are whining about $20 a year. Remember when you paid processing fees? Bought film? Had to mail pictures? Hundreds a year. Now, because companies find they need to make money so they can pay their employees (that'd be, in the greater sense, all companies and all employees, including the whiners), and want to ask for a $20 a YEAR fee, or $25 for 200 photos, people complain.
This "I want it for nothing" is part of why this country is in a mess, folks. Sorry, but the ads were wrong, you can't have it all, and you can't have it your way.
Reply
4-03-2009 @ 10:08AM
Doug said...
I don't normally read stuff like this (I have a life), but I'm a serious amateur photographer, so I was interested in the subject. This post was the only one that made any sense. Like he said, this is what's wrong with our country today. Stop whining and pay your your own way in life!