Will proposed national legislation kill the farmers market?
Filed under: Food
The Internet is abuzz with concern about the fate of farmer's markets under the newly proposed House Bill 875: Food and Safety Modernization Act of 2009. Many are alarmed that organic growers of local produce and even those gardening for themselves could be lumped in with commercial food vendors, calling them to meet new requirements for processes, record-keeping, and inspections.
I spoke with a spokesperson for Congresswoman Rosa L. DeLauro of Connecticut, who introduced the bill. The spokesperson assured me that the bill does not apply to vendors at farmer's markets, and therefore will not change the way this business runs. It is meant to address food sold in supermarkets.
A press release from DeLauro's office states, "There is no language in the bill that would result in farmers markets being regulated, penalized by any fines, or shut down. Farmers markets would be able to continue to flourish under the bill. In fact, the bill would insist that imported foods meet strict safety standards to ensure that unsafe imported foods are not competing with locally-grown foods."
In response to the question about organic growers and the possible impact of this bill, the Congresswoman's office responds "There is no language in the bill that would stop or interfere with organic farming. The National Organic Program (NOP) is under the jurisdiction of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). The Food Safety Modernization Act only addresses food safety issues under the jurisdiction of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)."
The intent of the legislation, I was told, is to revise the structure of the FDA by creating the Food Safety Administration. At present, oversight of the nation's food supply is fragmented among many government offices, and this bill would consolidate responsibility for maintaining food safety and responding to food-related issues such as the current peanut butter fiasco.
The bill has taken only its first baby step on the long path to passage, and there is no guarantee it will survive, or if it does, will survive intact. It has been referred to the House Agriculture Committee. If you have concerns, contact your representative now, while the bill is still undercooked.
- IT'S ON: Behind the War Between Obama & Big Biz - FORTUNE
- TOUGH BREAK: Toyota Recalls 400K Cars Over Steering Issue - CNNMoney
- 'SPILLIONAIRES': Who's Set to Profit From the BP Oil Spill? - Huffington Post
- BANG PER BUCK: The Most Efficient Companies on the Planet - The Motley Fool
- NO MORE COACH POTATOES: Gadgets to Take TV on the Go - FOX Business
- THE PULSE: Economic Signals From Cereal & Toothpaste - CNBC
- WHAT NOT TO WEAR: 10 Office Fashion Don'ts - Forbes
More
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-12-2009 @ 9:42PM
Jerry said...
Rep. DeLauro's office says there is no language in her bill that would apply to vendors at farmers markets or stop/interfere with organic farming. However, sec. 206 of the bill says, "Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator, in consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture and representatives of State departments of agriculture, shall promulgate regulations to establish science-based minimum standards for the safe production of food by food production facilities." The bill also says, "The term ‘food production facility’ means any farm, ranch, orchard, vineyard, aquaculture facility, or confined animal-feeding operation." So, under the bill, all farms--organic or not--are "food production facilities."
Contrary to the assurances of Rep. DeLauro's office, if the vendors at farmers markets are farmers, the bill most definitely applies to them. Further, does Rep. DeLauro know what regulations will be promulgated after passage after her bill? If not (and she can't), how does she know there will be no interference with organic farming?
Reply
10-28-2009 @ 8:11AM
Elaine said...
Although the spokesperson does sound reassuring the text of the bill definitely is in conflict with the comments intended to pacify those too lazy to read the text of the bill. READ IT! Any lawyer in this country could easily include every single entity in (and out of this country) that grows so much as a single carrot for consumption by another. To believe otherwise is folly. TAKE AN HOUR TO READ HR 875, how could one not believe it COULD include every farm in the world that produces and handles food. Good intentions maybe, bad, expensive, easily-manipulated results definitely. A spokespersons words mean nothing, the law of the bill is the law. And this law regulates to the level that marginally profitable farms will die.
Reply
4-03-2009 @ 9:02PM
Tony said...
This is not really surprising. Do we really think our representatives in Congress know what they are doing.
Just look at our current predicament, AIG bonuses or any other issue they have their fingers into and convince me "they" know what they are doing.
Reply