Your city bus costs more per mile than a first class overseas flight
Filed under: Transportation, Travel
Across the country, public transportation systems are telling weepy stories to politicians, begging for funding. In New York, crippling real estate holdings have led the MTA to warn riders of an impending 23% fare hike. Chicago, which just raised fares in January, is agitating for even more hikes.If New York's fare goes up again, it will mean its subway fares will have doubled in the past 16 years, far outpacing the general rise in the cost of living. As America's working people are forced to shoulder the burden of bad investment and inefficiency, I began to wonder just how much those of us who eschew car travel are paying per mile compared to other ways of getting around.
So I figured it out, because I thought you'd want to know. Here's how various forms of transportation stack up. For equality's sake, I priced everything based on a departure closest to 9 a.m. on April 15, tax day. That's a Wednesday, when fares are typically fairly cheap, so I'm giving everyone a head start:
AIR:
Southwest Airlines New York (Islip) to L.A.: $169 (Web special) or $424 (Business Select) for 2,462 miles
6.8¢ per mile (Web special) or 17¢ per mile (business)
JetBlue Airways New York to L.A.(Burbank) ($117) 2,455 miles
4.8¢ per mile
Delta economy class New York City to LAX: $119 for 2,462 miles
4.8¢ per mile
Delta business class New York City to LAX: $799 for 2,462 miles
32¢ per mile
Non-stop flight between Cincinnati and Tri-Cities Regional Airport in Virginia, two of the three most expensive American airports: $364 for 216 miles
$1.69 per mile
British Airways New York City to London (Heathrow) on British Airways in economy: $987 (I'm including taxes since they're so high) for 3,470 miles
28¢ per mile
British Airways New York City to London (Heathrow) on British Airways in business class: $5,747 for 3,470 miles
$1.66 per mile
British Airways New York City to London (Heathrow) on British Airways in first class: $8,306 for 3,470 miles
$2.39 per mile
Qantas LAX to Sydney: $1,705 (economy), $11,491 (business), $15,597 (first) for 7,487 miles
23¢ per mile (economy), $1.53 per mile (business), $2.08 per mile (first)
New York City to London on the Concorde, grounded since 2003: $4,650 for 3,470 miles
$1.34 per mile
RAIL:
Amtrak New York City to downtown L.A.: $243 for 2,462 miles
9.9¢ per mile
Amtrak (standard service) New York to Washington, D.C.: $103 for 204 miles
50¢ per mile
Acela New York City to Washington, D.C. ($155) 204 miles
76¢ per mile
BUS:
Greyhound bus New York City to Washington, D.C.: $41 (refundable fare) for 204 miles
20.1¢ per mile
Tripper Bus New York City to Washington, DC (Arlington, VA): $5 for 209 miles
2¢ per mile
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION:
These public transit systems charge a flat cash fare to go one mile within the center of their cities. So if you're using one for a quick trip, you'll pay the following:
New York Subway, Boston T: $2 per mile
Chicago El: $2.25 per mile
Atlanta MARTA: $1.75 per mile
Los Angeles subway: $1.25 per mile
San Francisco MUNI: $1.50 per mile
London Tube: £4, or $5.63 per mile (plus more if you travel beyond the central city)
Paris Métro: €1.60, or $2.01 per mile
Cairo metro: 1 Egyptian pound, or 18¢ per mile
Hong Kong MTR: HKD$7.7 or 99¢ per mile
SEA:
First class transatlantic (April 14 to Southampton): ($3,445 in Queens Grill class) 3,426 miles
$1.01 per mile
Queen Mary 2 transatlantic, cheapest fare in a double cabin: $1,145, balcony in Britannia class) 3,426 miles
33¢ per mile
Queen Mary 2 transatlantic, cheapest fare available right now this year: $845.00, Oct. 9, inside cabin 3,426 miles
25¢ per mile
So what kind of dispiriting conclusions can we draw from my simple mathematics exercise?
One: It costs about as much to fly out of Cincinnati as it does to fly first class on British Airways.
Two: It costs about twice as much to ride Chicago's El as it does to travel first class on one of the world's finest ocean liners.
Three: It costs more than four times as much to ride a mile the Tube in London as it used to cost to fly the Concorde.
In fact, almost all American public transportation systems cost more per mile than the Concorde or on first class on an overseas flight. Even in Los Angeles, where the subway is priced notably below many other cities, the per-mile rate is still $1 higher than a flight to London.
You can do the same math yourself. Just take the price in dollars and divide it by the miles traveled (I calculate as the crow flies) as described here. You can also find an online calculator that will compute how much you're paying to commute by your car, based on how far you go, what you pay in insurance, and so on.
Post your own fare calculations here. And try not to be bitter.
If you're interested in transportation, you may like
these related sites for: Maps, Driving Directions, Travel, and Cars.
Subscribe to Walletpopthese related sites for: Maps, Driving Directions, Travel, and Cars.



Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-06-2009 @ 4:22PM
dane said...
None of these calculations are correct. The author is comparing apples to oranges. I suggest recaclulating with the included costs needed to pay for the air-traffic control system, the roadway repair costs, and the traffic signal controls. After all, railways must pay for these, so airplanes and autos should, too. But they don't, because it is all government subsidized.
Reply
3-06-2009 @ 4:34PM
Tyler said...
While this article is cute, it has no basis in reality. Practically no one gets on a plane to go to work everyday, so the cost per mile comparing the two is irrelevant in trying to see what's a better deal. If you were to attempt to argue cars vs. rail, cars would lose in a landslide, hence the argument for public transit.
Reply
3-06-2009 @ 10:13PM
Jake said...
Plus...what commuter doesn't buy a monthly pass for these transit systems?
Reply
3-07-2009 @ 12:31PM
Man said...
The only one bitter is your math & science instructors.
Like others indicated the math may be correct but the methodology is wrong. Ignoring time, maintenance, availability, and amount of people moved per trip makes this useless.
Reply
3-07-2009 @ 1:37PM
Jason Cochran said...
This story is simply an analysis of straight fare cost per mile. That is, the fare cost to the rider for a mile traveled.
It doesn't take into account tax support for infrastructure (pretty much every form of transportation has that to some degree), and of course it doesn't assume you can take the QM2 to work at Starbucks. If you want to factor that stuff in, as well as maintenance and number of people moved per trip, then you're talking about a whole different set of considerations, calculations, and value judgments, then it becomes about systemic efficiency, and that's not nearly as fun.
However, you're free to post any computations of that sort. If it's even possible.
Reply
3-07-2009 @ 8:33PM
mesasone said...
So why don't you compare a trip using Grey Hound to taking a flight, using the same start and end points. That would be a far more accurate comparison.
Reply
3-08-2009 @ 1:36AM
WWARD4911 said...
I DID NOT AVERAGE TAXI COSTS..... BECAUSE THAT WOULD BE OUTRAGEOUS.....12.00 MINIMUM TO GO ABOUT 6 MILES IN WINSTON-SALEM, NC. AROUND 2.00 PLUS PER MILE AND THE COST OF CAR AND UPKEEP HAS BEEN COVERED AT LEAST ONCE ON THOSE 20 YEAR OLD PLUS CARS. TAKE INTO ACCOUNT IT TAKES ABOUT 15 MINUTES OR LESS TO GO THAT 6 MILES. MEANS SOMEONE IN TAXI INDUSTRY IS MAKING ABOUT 48.00 DOLLARS A HOUR
Reply
3-08-2009 @ 3:19AM
JOHNNIE said...
I'll call British Airways and have them land a 747 on my street to fly me to work on Monday morning.
Reply
3-08-2009 @ 9:56AM
Mick said...
I thought it was interesting. I wasn't expecting a scientific analysis.
Just took it for what it was and thought it was great. Thanks for the article.
Reply
3-08-2009 @ 12:10PM
rene said...
Great reporting, Jason. And great idea, too. Maybe it's just me, but these coments seem to ignore the point: The poor pay more. If government were doubling the cost of registering your vehicle, or local gas tax, people would not tolerate it. But the poor have no voice in this country. So let's pass it along to them. The comment about subsidies was interesting, too -- but I think it just serves to prove the point of the article: We do not bear the full brunt of *eveything* it costs to move a plane, train, or automobile from Point A to Point B. But we do continue to stick it to the poor. Thanks again, Jason, I will definitely return to your blog.
Reply
3-08-2009 @ 6:35PM
Mary said...
Rene-
While I wholeheartedly agree with your advocacy on behalf of the poor. You're missing the point a bit. You seem to have fallen prey to a common myth about public transportation--that it serves the poor. However, NYC is an anomaly here. In NYC, millionaires and even billionaires (Mike the Mayor) take subways and buses and while the poor are affected disproportionately in any fare increase, the point here is that the mishandling of funds by the MTA and government's failure to subsidize public transport to any degree of effienciency are unfairly being redistributed to straphangers. But that's not the only bad news, the fare is increasing at the same time the service is decreasing (Good-bye W train).
Some numbers:
Actual cost per rider to maintain subway system- $3.00/ride
Cost per ride to straphangers- $2.00/ride
Cost with a monthly- $1.13/ride
Needed subsidy- $1.00/ride at single fare or $1.87/ride with unlimited.
Looks like this hike will not be the last.
3-09-2009 @ 7:46AM
PaulC said...
But, but, but...
His methodology is flawed, as is his logic.
Who paid for the airport? Who paid for air traffic control? Are government subsidies factored into his math?
He compares flying a plane from NYC to London, to taking the T one mile, the shortest possible distance. For example he claims that Boston is $2 per mile. Well, I get on at Alewife and go all the way to Braintree every weekday which is about 15 miles, so $2/15miles = 13 cents a mile and with a Charlie card (did he ever return? No, he never returned) the math is $1.70/15miles = 11 cents.
As a weird aside.... The monthly pass would actually cost me MORE per mile $59 per month with 20 work days = $59/300 miles = 20 cents per mile. :(
AND, I don't drive my car for work, at all. That means less maintenance and lower monthly fuel costs. AND, I can read my book on the T, but not in my car.
Reply
3-09-2009 @ 8:23AM
Laura@GPI said...
I think an option was forgotten - if you can ride your bike to work, or even walk, then it's free per mile. And the health benefits might actually save you money ...
3-09-2009 @ 9:07AM
DanielleM said...
Jason, I'm going to have to correct you on one critical piece of information.
The New York City Subway is not $2 per mile, but $2 from any one point in the city to another. That means you can effectively get on in Riverdale (a neighborhood in the north Bronx that borders Westchester) and get off in Far Rockaway (a neighborhood in the southernmost tip of Queens that borders Nassau County). That's almost 30 miles of subway track for 2 bucks. Still the best deal in New York!
:)
Reply
3-09-2009 @ 11:09AM
Steve said...
Cute but misleading ... Your comparing some airfare deals (best case) to the worst case public transportation. So if you take MARTA to go from Doraville to the Airport for $1.75 then your paying less than 10 cents per mile not $1.75 per mile.
Reply
3-09-2009 @ 11:11AM
Jason Cochran said...
Steve and Danielle, if you just go a mile on the subway, you'll pay the full fare for it, which is why I say "so if you're using one for a quick trip..."
Reply
3-29-2009 @ 5:22PM
tom said...
Commuters are preparing for a massive Boycott against the MTA in New York City on June 9th 2009. They are fed up with the continious fare increases and are ready to let the MTA know that the increases are just not fair. The article and boycott information can be obtained by sending an email to saynotomta4@aol.com a copy will be returned to your inbox.. Please do not send a postal address.
Reply