The Food Police invade Illinois school, tattle on kid's lunch habits
One Illinois school system has taken an unusual step to fight childhood obesity; requiring kids to use their fingerprints to pay for their school lunch choices. The technology, supplied by Nutrikids, can provide interested parents with a detailed record of the dining habits of their children. No more Cheesedoodles for you, Tubby!
The system has other advantages for the school. The kids prepay for lunch, so the school has a nice pool of cash. It cuts down on the need for staff and reduces shrinkage. When the child's account gets light, an email is automatically sent to parents reminding them to deposit more lunch money.
Parents can also choose to receive emails listing their children's lunch choices, so they can direct them to better selections. Sound OK, right?
Let's look at it in a different way, though. Suppose your children could get a full listing of your lunch choices- would they show more wisdom of choice? Or are you sneaking those cheesy fries and pasta Alfredo?
Kids are perceptive enough to learn from the example set by others, rather than the ideals presented in a lecture. If you'd be embarrassed to have kids see your lunch choices, why would your kids feel any differently? Tech like this doesn't change behavior; it simply inspires creative workarounds. The kid whose parents don't care enough to sign up for the program will be sitting pretty, with a plateful of the unhealthy foods that other kids will be eager to swap for.
So the child's eating behavior at school won't change his habitsso long as he comes home to a household full of potato chips, pizza and Oreos. Perhaps you need a fingerprint reader for your fridge, too.



Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
1-14-2009 @ 6:25PM
Billita Jacobsen said...
Big Brother is alive and well! Does this alarm anyone else? Anyone find this intrusive? Watch for this invasive policy to goose-step its way into other schools so our children become accustomed to Big Brother wanting a fingerprint.
If we don't protest things such as children being fingerprinted in order to get lunch it won't be long before we'll all be scanned in order to purchase food. It's a disgusting prospect, much like being a tagged animal tracked by a farmer.
Also, did this "technology" cost the taxpayer anything? If not, what does the company offering it hope to gain?
Reply
1-14-2009 @ 7:23PM
localhawaiian said...
I am with you on this one. There are times that kids should be kids, thinking you can control what they do and what they eat is the most stupidest thing I have ever heard of.
I think some of these schools are intrusive in the way they "police" our kids and their lunches.
My daughter used to take home lunch, she came home one day when she was in 3rd grade to tell me they took away her pudding cup cause it had too much sugar. But what was worse is that they have in their lunches doritos that have MSG in it. I would rather my child have something I know she is eating that I gave her that has calcium in it then something that will give her cancer and health issues later on.
It is sad to think they are wasting so much time watching what they eat instead of what they are learning!
I don't even have doritos at home why would I want it served in school?! I guess as long as it has "fat free" on it that makes it OK? They need to pull their heads out of their butts and let me raise my kids the way I see fit!
Reply
1-14-2009 @ 7:47PM
Mark said...
Can the thought police be far behind?
Reply
1-14-2009 @ 8:29PM
marjorie said...
People do not understand about school lunch program...under the food program if a item, fruit energy bar or whatever is put on the tr\ay it is tossed into the garbage if the child does not eat it...you cannot let them take it home or give it to anyone else. this is the program that costs millions....so in order ot cut costs to those of the parrrrents who pay for lunchs they have to come up with someway to cover the good food they are suppose to be providing students...I have eaten at schools in three states and it is not very good, and I wonder about the grey hamburger meat and the greasy tacos that the kids get being good for them....someone needs to get come commen sense about food and kids...the food police in schools are as unreal as the wic program that provides food for women, infants and children......the amount of milk and other items given to people is unreal...much of it is sold or given to family memebers...a pregant woman cannot drink the amount of milk she is told to drink without gaining way too much weight, and when you have 3 or 4 children on the program you get the same amount of milk for each child, and end up with more then they drink in the months time...so please someone get real, and feed the kids the way they eat instead of trying to force them to eat like someone in an ivory tower wants them to...the billions of dollors that is wasted across the country with these programs is unreal.....
Reply
1-15-2009 @ 8:43AM
Steve said...
Isn't St. Louis in Missouri and not Illinois?
Plus the article linked says that parents can OPT OUT of their child getting their fingerprint scanned.
Please read the article before you rant about big brother, people!
Reply