Tink's triumph: Disney dusts off the 55-year-old fairy -- to shining results
Filed under: Extracurriculars, Kids and Money

The royal Disney product category remains the Princesses, which rakes in some $4 billion a year, but the Mouse is working hard to boot up another girly franchise, which so far has raked in $800 million. In 2005, Disney dusted off the old duster and began releasing a series of books based on Peter Pan's testy sidekick. Taking a page from the comics, Disney gave Tink a story that began before Peter, and teamed her up with a few new fairies bestowed with X-Men powers, such as the ability to control water. Once kids were versed in these new, ethnically mixed Disney characters (Silvermist, Fawn, Iridessa, and Rosetta), rare in that they weren't launched on the silver screen, a successful line of Pixie Hollow toys followed.
And just in time. On Oct. 7, Merrill Lynch downgraded Disney stock, saying that economic woes will dent its profits, and now the race is on to put some solid infrastructure behind the Tink craze. That includes an array of profile-pumping "Disney Fairies" exercises including a website and a tie-in with the U.S. Department of Energy. On Oct. 28, a new computer-animated DVD movie starring Tinker Bell was released. No longer mute, the old gal, who has been AARP-eligible for five years, now talks with a cadence and a vocabulary that recalls that other Disney character with magical profit abilities: Miley Cyrus.
A New Look for Old Brands
What changed: Little girls have been inundated with Disney princess paraphernalia for years now, and the line has been so popular that the company wants to try to do the same thing with fairies. Tinker Bell, a mere side character in J.M. Barrie's 1911 novel and the 1953 movie version of Peter Pan, is going to soon be a leading lady. A straight-to-DVD movie, Tinker Bell, comes out October 28, and that will be followed by a line of books, toys, lip gloss and stationary. The new line could mean big bucks as Tink already brings in about $800 million in retail sales for existing products.
AP | Disney
What changed: Pepsi has unveiled its fifth new logo in 2 decades, right, as part of a new plan to redefine itself as a cultural leader. The redesigned Pepsi packages should hit store shelves early next year. Mountain Dew and Sierra Mist drinks will also get a new look.
AP / Pepsico
What changed: For the first time, Long John Silver's will be offering its first non-fried items. The Freshside Grille selections includePacific Salmon (pictured), Shrimp Scampi and Tilapia.
YUM! / AP
What changed: The national restaurant chain went through a drastic decor makeover in 2008 to make the furnishings more upscale and sleek from its former look with Tiffany-style lamps and antiques. Total cost? $65 million. When the company got to the last of its locations, it staged a mock explosion, blowing up the interior and replaying the action on YouTube. Now all 600 locations of the 36-year-old chain have a modern look with black awnings outside and black-and-white checked tablecloths inside, plus a new straightforward logo.
RubyTuesday.com
What changed: Popeye's is sporting a new look with an orange and red logo with the words "Louisiana Kitchen" set off by fleur-de-lis designs and a giant "P" in the middle the better to emphasize the almost 40-year-old chain's New Orleans roots. Gone is the blue-bordered logo that the company deemed not fancy enough to go after the upscale audience it seeks to court. The logo makeover comes in conjunction with a new $1.49 menu that will include a loaded chicken wrap, the delta mini sandwich and a chicken biscuit. New commercials will feature a fictional chef named Ed, who sits with diners and talks about his food.
Popeyes
What changed: Chex Party Mix, invented in 1955, will get a makeover with new recipes, new packaging and a new spokeschef, Katie Lee Joel, (pictured in the center, with Suzanne M. Grimes, president, Food & Entertaining at Readers Digest on the right and Cheri Olerud, senior cookbook editor and test kitchen expert for Chex cereal on the left.
Business Wire
What changed: The venerable crock pot, long a staple of the American kitchen, is trying to become the ultimate multi-tasker for the contemporary two-income family that wants to eat healthy. Crock Pot's owner, Jarden Consumer Solutions, wants the slow cooker to become a "trophy" product that people want to give as gifts and buy for themselves. So new cookers will come in bright colors no more cream and burgundy and will feature updated packaging that evokes savory root vegetables rather than grandma's quilt.
Crock-Pot | Hughes Design Group
What changed: The 400-location hotel worldwide hotel chain is in the middle of a $1.7 billion project to renovate about half its U.S. hotels. The new look includes brighter colors in the room, with pillowtop beds and white duvets and flat-screen TVs. Sheraton is rolling out a branded line of toiletries, called Shine by Bliss, and fitness centers will get upgrades. Lobbies will feature restaurants, most with a casual dining chain called Relish, and cafes with Internet stations. Some locations may also have a steakhouse developed by Shula's.
AP
What changed: Now owned by Stride Rite, which re-acquired the rights to the sneaker brand from hip-hop mogul Damon Dash (a recent foreclosure victim), PRO-Keds are going to get a makeover as they come back into the fold. Stride Rite will focus on classic styles, such as the "Royal" canvas basketball shoe, first introduced in 1949, and give it an overhaul that will hit stores in November and retail for $50 to $80.
ProKeds.com
What changed: Hasbro updated the 60-year-old game of Clue with changes that include a fancy new mansion with a spa and theater, and new weapons like a baseball bat and an ax. Professor Plum is now an Internet billionaire and Colonel Mustard is a former football star, and the murder mystery takes place during a party for the rich and famous. The game structure has also changed somewhat, with the addition of a second deck of cards, which is supposed to add an extra element of surprise.
Hasbro
Also this month, a permanent version of Pixie Hollow, the newly invented home base for the fairies, opened in the kiddie areas of both Disneyland and Walt Disney World, providing an all-day meet-and-greet area for costumed characters. Finally given a voice, Tinker Bell can actually chat with toddlers. It won't be long before the parks start giving little girls fairy makeovers complete with hair, nails, and dress, the way they already do for princesses at $190 to $250.
Meanwhile, High School Musical pulled in a $46 million opening weekend at the movies. That's a drop in the budget compared to the fairies' $800 million haul, and the teenybopper trilogy was given a measly street performance gig at the Hollywood Studios park in Florida.
The return to a vintage character from the heyday of hand-drawn animation is unusual for Disney's trend-driven management. In recent years, Disney has all but ignored the classics to promote the new generation of movies created after 1989, especially those by Pixar. The working animation studio at Walt Disney World, where tourists could once watch artists create movies like Lilo & Stitch, was shut down, and the art that built the Disney empire is now given scant attention beyond the odd DVD extra feature.
The success of Tinker Bell has always baffled me. At heart, she's a hateful, homicidal character. Watch the 1953 movie that made her famous. She spends the entire film trying to murder Wendy. Yet in a country where ultra-religious factions protest Harry Potter in the name of rejecting witchcraft, good old Tink has somehow gotten a pass, mostly on the back of her association with the Disney reputation. Still, given a choice between the boy-pleasing ethic implicit in the Princess movement and the don't-mess-with-me vibe of the athletic Tinker Bell, I'd pick the pixies.
The Mouse has struggled to create a similarly successful analog for little boys. It has had mild success with pirates (role model there: the dissolute Captain Jack Sparrow), but nothing on the level of its zeitgeist-changing Davy Crockett home run from Tink's early years.



Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
10-31-2008 @ 3:42PM
New York University said...
A very informative article. I guess Disney will retain its past glory
Reply
11-01-2008 @ 11:00AM
Sally G said...
With the long-time creativity of the Disney people, and their strategy of limited release of classics for each generation, I suspect that they will continue to succeed overall, even if they fall prey to short-term setbacks like everyone else. They still have their reputation, and that counts for a lot. It seems that every generation has both new and classic Disney characters to love. I don't know why Disney and Pixaar went their separate ways, but both studios have done great animations.
Reply
11-01-2008 @ 7:00PM
daddy-O said...
They did not go their separate ways. Eisner & Jobs had disputed for years the exact terms of the original Pixar-produced, Disney-marketed agreement. Six concepts were to be developed into feature-length films. Jobs claimed it was for exactly 6 productions, meaning that sequals would count in the tally. Disney got an extra movie out of the deal with Toy Story 2. Jobs, also the co-founder of Apple Computers, drew the line there and talks broke off. Both companies stood to lose out on billions in profits. Enter Disney's new CEO who announced in January, 2006, that Disney would aquire Pixar for $7.4B. Jobs was plenty cool with nearly 60% of the cash going into his pocket & ended the possibility of any future disagreements. Basically Pixar, originally started by George Lucas, has come full circle, being that the company's earliest roots (and employees) were in Disney enterprises.
11-01-2008 @ 12:17PM
bb said...
I've been a Tink fan for as long as I can remember, and have read the new Tink children's books as well as the Peter books by Dave Barry, but do not like the beginning og the new Tinker Bell DVD movie, credtitng the fairies with creating nature, the change of the seasons and the making of each uniique snowflake -- fairies are fun, and "Yes, I DO believe in fairies" but also in the God of all creation, the God of the Bible. Disney himself wouldn't have let Tink be the supreme being!
Reply
11-01-2008 @ 7:26PM
Ron said...
In Walt's world, God would have given the fairies those jobs as making snowflakes and changing the seasons and such. I mean why wouldn't God do this?
11-01-2008 @ 12:34PM
masterchaosdemon said...
I can't stand Tinker Bell. Why make her a role model for young children? She can't control her anger and from what I recall, didn't she try to get Wendy killed? Great going Disney! If Walt wasn't frozen, he'd roll over in his grave...
Reply
11-01-2008 @ 1:15PM
Pam said...
Oh I Do believe in fairies, I do believe in Fairies, I do believe in fairies. Come on, if you belive in fairies clap so Tink can hear you.... That was a magical, innocent time for myself and so many other boomer babies. What is wrong withTinkerbell? Nothing if you ak me, you just needed a little bit of fairey dust and think happy thoughts so that you can fly. So what if she had a temper - the lesson in the end is we all need each to survive and sometimes, that help will come from the most unlikely of places. Disney always has been and always be a magical place for me. Never loose you inner child, for we only grow old when we stop believing. not because we grew up.
Reply
11-01-2008 @ 8:10PM
missnanse said...
You said it.....I am a Disney fan from way back and I loved Tink, but Mickey is my # 1 Guy.
11-01-2008 @ 1:40PM
Bryan said...
They look like Bratz! Maybe Disney should give the money back ...
Reply
11-01-2008 @ 6:08PM
Riki said...
Here's one little gem neither Disney nor Hollywood will EVER get their hands on so long as its creator lives: http://www.everlandonline.com
Reply
11-01-2008 @ 5:17PM
jen said...
um bb? Peter Pan was written by J M Barrie, not Dave Barry. Dave Barry (is) (was) a newspaper columnist. Don't know if he still writes.
Reply
11-01-2008 @ 6:44PM
someone said...
Actually, Dave Barry did co write a peter pan trilogy for Disney
11-01-2008 @ 6:11PM
Super Melsa said...
Does anyone else find this crushingly sad? Tinkerbell has manged to charm Disney fans (and the world in general) for over fifty years while somehow always managing to retain some of her classic, genuine, Disney MAGIC. And part of her magic is how she can have one of the most heart-on-face personalities you'll ever see without ever having said a word -- and certainly not through the soulless voice of Miley Cyrus. It's a crime to make her another TALKING head for a corporation that has allowed once-brilliant magic to have only a favorite color (green) in common with Tinkerbell and what she used to represent.
Reply
11-01-2008 @ 8:04PM
Linn said...
I agree 100% !! Obviously, trying to make $$$ anyway they can. Writers get commission don't they? I'm sure Walt would not like much of what's going on. Especially, the ruining of the Contemporary Hotel view with another timeshare.
11-01-2008 @ 6:31PM
nick korkos said...
you got to be kidding me tiker bell if i remembered tryed killing wendy plus she has a very bad temper at least harry potter has a good storyline they just took j m barries charecter added some new checters and destroyed the whole charecter j m barrie created damn disney must be damn desperate they destroyed a classic charecter friom a classic novel by making a new movie and adding new charecters and destroying the whole peter pan storyline j m barrie if i remembered did not want peter pan his novel to be touched by disney he hated walt disney he never wanted to make peter pan in a disney film p s the new tinker bell movie sucks ass buy the orginial novel and enjoy that or watch hook by steven spielberg
Reply
11-01-2008 @ 6:51PM
Shell said...
leave it to the new disney to ruin another old favorite ..
Turning tink into a bratz doll hootchie ...Can't little girls have nice roll models anymore they are gonna grow up soon enough they don't need their little charactors like this they(not disney) even ruined strawberry shortcake she was a cute ragdoll but I guess sexy is much better for our little ones than fun and cute..
Reply
11-01-2008 @ 6:52PM
RaraAvis said...
The Peter Pan movie is riddled with stereotypes typical of the era, including the portrayal of Tink as the jealous (and therefore homocidal) girlfriend. How nice to give her a chance to show another side of herself. My girls - 5 and 3 - adore her and the other fairies. I like them, too. They're sassy.
Reply
11-01-2008 @ 7:06PM
MRAMERICA said...
TINKER BELL AND ZAC EFFRON ?! DISNEY IS GETTING REDUNDANT WITH ITS PRESENTATION OF FAIRIES.
Reply
11-04-2008 @ 2:12AM
just passing thru said...
haha! nice
11-01-2008 @ 7:16PM
Sunny said...
I agree.
I do NOT like the new look.
They look like the cheap, slutty girl dolls, "Bratz".and I suspect the one on the far right is a lesbian (not that there's anything wrong with that...)
I am plenty old enough to remember the original Tinker Bell and I think some things just shouldn't change with the times.
Reply