The American income tax system is broken
Filed under: Tax
If there's one thing all Americans can agree on, it's that our income tax system is terrible. Navigating through the rules is a nightmare, and no matter how little or how much people pay in income taxes, they almost always end up feeling cheated. Here are my top five reasons why I hate our income tax system:
1. Too complex – Even the professionals don't understand the entire code. There are volumes of books dedicated to translating the rules and helping tax preparers learn how to apply them. The number of different rules is astonishing, and it's no wonder that many mistakes are made on tax returns. Why have a system that the average taxpayer can't understand? Why make it so difficult that most people can't even prepare their own taxes anymore?
2. Loopholes to benefit special interests – It's no secret that all the special deductions and credits have their roots in the special interests of one group or another. Why is there a tax credit for one industry, but not another? Because the one with the tax credit probably lobbied more and threw more money at lawmakers. It's not right. It violates a basic sense of fairness and guarantees that the free markets aren't working on their own. We want the free market to decide what industries and activities are the most efficient and worthwhile. We don't need the government intervening to give a special advantage to one industry, at the expense of others. That's exactly what parts of our current tax code do.
3. Punishes productivity – If you make more, you're taxed at a higher rate. Sure, the theory is that if you're better off, you can "afford" to pay a larger share of taxes. But is that really necessary or even fair? Why should a high income individual have to pay 36% in federal income taxes on the top level of income they've generated? Do they not deserve to keep just as much of their earnings as the lower income person? Not under our tax system, they don't. The IRS admits that the top 5% of all taxpayers pay over half of all income taxes, even though they account for only one-third of the income.
4. Inherently unfair – The larger your family, the lower your income taxes. That sounds very unfair to me. Suppose you have a single man with no children who makes $60,000 and uses the standard deduction. He'll owe $9,243 in federal income taxes. Compare that to a man with a wife and four small children earning $60,000. He will pay no federal income taxes. (That's right. Zero.)
I understand that it's harder to support a family of six on $60,000 than a family of one. Yet the single man with no children had to work equally as hard to earn his $60,000 as the family man did, but the single man has a big tax bill to go along with it. Clearly, the family of six utilizes proportionately more government services than the single man does, yet they pay no income taxes. Is that fair? Of course not.
5. Tries to regulate behavior – Tax deductions and credits are offered for things that are deemed "good," such as charitable contributions or the costs of owning a home. But is it really the place of our government to try to encourage or discourage certain behaviors with monetary incentives and penalties? I'd argue that it's not.
Our tax system is so broken, that it can't be fixed. Our best alternative is to wipe out what we have and start over. We need to find a solution that gives everyone a stake in our government. That means everyone should pay, even if it's only a token amount.
The goal of a new tax system should be fairness across the board. Don't punish people who don't have families or who have found a way to make a lot of money. Don't try to punish or reward certain behaviors. Just have us all pay a small part of the tax bill so that no group of people is unfairly burdened by a bad and complicated system.
Tracy L. Coenen, CPA, MBA, CFE performs fraud examinations and financial investigations for her company Sequence Inc. Forensic Accounting, and is the author of Essentials of Corporate Fraud.



Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-29-2008 @ 5:40PM
Pat said...
I agree with you points, and also think a flat rate tax with no exemtions is the most fair of tax programs. That way everyone would pay 2%, 3% or whatever and as there would be no exemptions, the return could be filled out by anyone just about. We could cut the size of the IRS, and I think it would be easier to figure how many tax dollars were going to the government which would allow them to set their budget (it is of course beyond hope that they would stay within their budget like the rest of us have to do).
Reply
10-29-2008 @ 12:04PM
Curt said...
What about the "Fair Tax"?
Reply
10-29-2008 @ 6:04PM
D said...
I would agree especially with the fourth reason. Really it is unfair to those who do not have children to be taxed at a much higher rate then those who do (many of which either recieve a hefty refund or pay no fed taxes at all) I understand that it cost money to have children to support them, however if you look at the way the system is set up that refund many families receive is in large part due to the rest of the single tax filers who actually pay taxes and support our programs such as the military, education, and infrastructure. Fair tax is the way to go. Tax wealth not wages.
Reply
10-29-2008 @ 7:21PM
Eli said...
I agree on #1, 2, & 5, but he definitely stepped into selfish yuppie territory. The reason that you pay more taxes when you make more is to level the playing field for the people who weren't born with the gifts you were (intelligence, stable family, etc) Also : "top 5% of all taxpayers...account for one-third of the income" and that doesn't sound odd to you? Last math class i took told me that 5% did not, and never should, equal 1/3.
Reply
10-29-2008 @ 12:50PM
Tracy Coenen said...
Sorry for the confusion. It's not saying they're equal. There are about 138 million taxpayers. The top 5% will be about 6.9 million people. Those 6.9 million earn about 1/3 of all the income (everyone's income added together) but pay about 1/2 of all the income taxes.
10-29-2008 @ 7:30PM
buzz said...
SENIORS SHOULD NOT HAVE TO PAY INCOME TAX ON THIER SOCIAL SECURITY.......BUZZ
Reply
10-30-2008 @ 7:19AM
veronica said...
there willnever be a flat tax. it sounds so good to get rid of the irs but it will never happen. why? because the lobbists for the accountants, tax preparers,and tax lawyers will stop it.so much government money is used to fund the irs.it would save the govt billions to cut out the mess the tax code has made. big business doesnt really pay all those taxes because of loopholes.and taxing social security is nuts. govt has had interest free money for years. why tax it. i wont live long enough tto get social security. so my money that is put in wont go to anybody but the irs.
Reply
11-07-2008 @ 2:15PM
BUZZ said...
RIGHT ON I WILL NEVER GET A DIME FROM MY 34 YEARS OF PAYING INTO S.S. i get my check....less 60%...FROM MY DECEASED HUSBANDS S.S. HE WORKED 50 YEARS. THE REASON I GET CUT 60% IS BECAUSE I WORKED 15 YRS. FOR AN STATE AGENCY !!!!!!!YES !! FIGURE THAT ONE M R. B ARNEY FRANK
11-05-2008 @ 3:49PM
bvllets said...
In reference to #4, they always forget to account for how much the single guy pays for porn.
Reply
12-09-2008 @ 9:50AM
Roland Hulme said...
Good Lord, what a ridiculous article that turned out to be.
3, 4 and 5 are stupid observations. Of course the rich should pay a higher percentage, because they pay a lower percentage of their income in living expenses. Middle and working class people SPEND their money and DRIVE the economy, so give them more money and it'll benefit EVERYBODY. Coenen's just regurgitated Reaganomics, which is the most flawed and ridiculous economic theory in history.
Reply