U.S. Passports: made overseas, obscenely profitable
Filed under: Ripoffs and Scams, Transportation
The Washington Times Post recently ran a three-part series that calls into question one of the primary tools used in our "War on Terror", the new U.S. Passport. According to the W.T., U.S. passports are printed and assembled overseas in countries with highly questionable security and sold to us at a 600% markup.
The Government Printing Office (GPO), the government agency that handles most government printing needs, decided to outsource insertion of computer chip and radio-frequency i.d. technology into the newly redesigned passports, and fought the suggestion to limit bidders to domestic companies. The winning company, based in the Netherlands, now receives the passport blanks from the GPO, adds the computer chip, then ships them off to Thailand where the RFID antennas are added. Remember Thailand? Land of government instability nestled in the crook between India, Russia and China?
UPDATE: The GPO responds.
The new technology allows border guards to scan the passport and wirelessly access information encoded in the computer chip. Producing these new passports costs the GPO $7.97, which it marks up to $15 to sell to the State Department. The State Department then marks them up to $100 to sell to us.
I had to read the story twice to assure myself this wasn't a bit of Dave Berry Barry farce. How could the GPO think that Americans would stand for such a compromise to their security? Aren't there ANY American companies that can handle these? And why does our government charge us a markup of over 600% for an essential document?
If we care so little about the security of our passports, why not simply let Wal-Mart handle our passport business? I bet they could get the cost down to $9.99, or two for $15.
these related sites for: Maps, Driving Directions, Travel, and Cars.



Reader Comments (Page 1 of 10)
10-23-2008 @ 11:38AM
Millsworth said...
" sold to we citizens at 600% markup."
That should be "sold to us citizens..." Would you say "he sold it to we?"
Maybe they are going overseas because that's where people can speak and write English.
Reply
10-23-2008 @ 12:18PM
John said...
If the government is going to charge me $100.00 for a passport then they had better send Air Force One to take me to wherever I am going to! By the way- It is we citizens when used in that sentencing.
10-24-2008 @ 9:35AM
Jan said...
John is wrong and you are correct. It should be "sold to us citizens" because the preposition "to" requires the object pronoun "us" not the subject pronoun "we."
10-24-2008 @ 10:20AM
ashlea said...
"we" in that particular instance is grammatically correct. Go back to school. Or maybe schools nowadays don't teach correct grammar - that's more than likely.
10-24-2008 @ 10:23AM
Gary Somerset said...
I am the spokesman for the U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO). I would like to correct Mr. Barlow’s story. The Washington Post did not run a three-part series, as Mr. Barlow claimed. The Washington Times ran inaccurate stories last spring. GPO and Public Printer Bob Tapella responded by giving the correct facts.
The manufacturing of the nation’s passports is not done overseas. The men and women of GPO produce the passports at factories in Washington D.C. and Stennis, Mississippi. Here is a link to factual information about the production of the U.S. passport: http://www.gpo.gov/congressional/pdfs/factsheet_e-passport.pdf
Here are several more links:
A reporter with Government Executive challenged the inaccurate Washington Times story:
http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?filepath=/dailyfed/0308/032708j1.htm
The Public Printer’s letter to Congress refuting the inaccurate allegations raised by The Washington Times:
http://www.gpo.gov/congressional/pdfs/ltr_securityofpassports_040908.pdf
These are the responses GPO put out immediately after these inaccurate stories appeared in The Washington Times:
http://www.gpo.gov/news/2008/08news11.pdf
http://www.gpo.gov/news/2008/08news12.pdf
http://www.gpo.gov/news/2008/08news13.pdf
Feel free to contact me with any questions at public-relations@gpo.gov.
I hope I cleared up any inaccurate information.
Thank you.
10-24-2008 @ 10:51AM
Diva said...
We do not need terrorists to destroy our country. We're selling ourselves away one inch at a time to anyone who crawls from under a rock. They're clever, we're stupid.
10-24-2008 @ 11:28AM
Shellie said...
"Maybe they are going overseas because that's where people can speak ane write English"
You are missing the point. Regardless of the grammar used by the writer of this article, the distressing fact is that our passports are being made overseas in countries that have questionable ties to terrorist activities.
Grammar police have no place in a serious discussion of national security, and the security of our citizens who carry this necessary document when they travel outside of the United States.
10-24-2008 @ 11:27PM
Jeanne Price said...
I wonder where the new travel cards for Mexico and Canada are being made?
Bidders should be limited to the Continental U.S., Alaska and Hawaii.
JP
10-24-2008 @ 12:41PM
hazmaire said...
I say amen to that, now days you can't get a job in a 5 & 10 cent store if you can't speak spanish.
10-24-2008 @ 2:09PM
Darkenwyck said...
Gary Somerset - if all you stated to be true and accurate, does this also mean that by providing information that you have here, will also ensure that other necessary documents are infact, produced and regulated here in the United States? If you happen to have access to select documents, please provide documentation to the court that proves the birth place of Barrack Obama, as this is in question, and he has tried to avoid giving out the true information.
10-24-2008 @ 7:29PM
Ron said...
Read the replies. Loved the grammar corrections. Wonder, however, what grammar has to do with the fact that the United States Government is having citizens passports sent overseas to have security devices installed into them? Seems to me that security is not in the equation. What is preventing any of these passports from being manipulated for sinister reasons? What kind of information is on the passport after it is sent beyond the US borders to be modified in India and Thailand?
10-24-2008 @ 4:30AM
Frank Niles said...
Ah yes, the golden triangle. USA......Netherlands........Thailand........USA. I know who pays the gold but I'm wondering who is getting the gold.
Reply
10-24-2008 @ 6:10AM
Herman said...
Millsworth:
Many can speak English, but can we understand it from them?
Reply
10-24-2008 @ 6:26AM
joseph said...
american politics: we as americans pay for whatever we wnat as a supply and demand well it is about time we damand change !!!!!! casue with cueernt standards of nato a job a day in the U.S.A. is taken away and never given back !!!!!!
Reply
10-24-2008 @ 6:37AM
finalCD said...
Ahhh, "The Chip", another tracking device in our current state of marshal law.
Reply
10-24-2008 @ 3:38PM
Lisa said...
It doesn't matter what country makes them. What matters is that THEY SHOULDN'T BE MADE AT ALL! North American Union/New World Order here we come! Get right with God folks cuz it will be a wild ride.
10-24-2008 @ 6:35AM
Bonnie said...
It is a know wonder why our country is in the terrible state we are in. We can't even pay a company in our country to do the work and our own country is robbing it's own citizens. Who can we trust?
Reply
10-24-2008 @ 6:48AM
Lee said...
I've been travelling internationally on business for many years. I always felt that the US Passport I carried was well made. However, the last Passport I've received is shoddily made with a cover given to wrinkle. In order to maintain it in some semblance of a good appearance, I purchased a clear plastic cover for it which helps...but it is still pretty poor. I'm very upset about our government (and business community) contracting off-shore for so many of our domestic needs. And the very idea that we are losing jobs for our countrymen, while being fleeced at a 600% margin, is unconscionable. I've never had much respect for our DOS, and now with this, less still.
Reply
10-24-2008 @ 6:52AM
GEO said...
That has got to be one of the 'stupidest' examples of an out of control bureaucracy... And is so basic and fundamental to ENSURING document security. Makes you wonder... 'why it would ever be a question'! Of course they should be 'managed and controlled' here! It is only common sense!
How many times are we going to have to 'pay the price' for the lowest bidder?!?
Reply
10-24-2008 @ 9:29AM
Maura said...
You are the first and only person who reacted correctly to the main point of this article, i.e. of course it is stupid for the main security document which U.S. citizens carry abroad to be made and made "secure" in other countries!
What are you other people doing focusing on the correct/incorrect usage of "we citizens?"
If you think that 9/11 was the only terrorist attack the U.S. will experience on our own soil, you need to wake up. Our superiority complex has built up a lot of bad credit elsewhere.
Furthermore, 24% of Americans who travel to other countries are now victims of violent crime. We have a great country which has fallen from the heights we soared 50 years ago. Corruption and greed are not simply rife in Washington and on Wall Street. We all need to take personal responsible and stop this culture of "me" first, and not "we."