AIG spa trip redux: Canceled!
Filed under: Insurance, Ripoffs and Scams, Wealth, Fraud, Recession
As if one trip to a luxury spa resort wasn't enough for American International Group (AIG) following its taxpayer-funded bailout, the company had plans to do it all over again. 50 AIG managers were scheduled to do a deluxe retreat at the Ritz-Carlton resort in Half Moon Bay. The company said it was going to host 150 top-producing agents for educational purposes.
The cost of this "educational opportunity?" Ritz Carlton rooms go for $300 to $1,200 a night, plus high costs for meals, drinks, and entertainment. If the earlier trip is any indication, this whole extravaganza could cost the company around $500,000.
Outrage from taxpayers has led management to cancel this outing, and lawmakers are relieved. Some defended the trips as standard fare for high-level producers for insurance companies. The independent agents win these trips by selling a lot of insurance products. Yet it seems excessive in light of the taxpayer assistance required by AIG.
With taxpayers on the hook for billions of dollars of loans made to AIG to help keep them in business, the company needs to find another way to give incentives to the sales force. Standard industry practice or not, these trips don't go over well during a time when belts are being tightened by the little guys. The cancellation of the trip is good news for now. Let's see what AIG comes up with next.
Tracy L. Coenen, CPA, MBA, CFE performs fraud examinations and financial investigations for her company Sequence Inc. Forensic Accounting, and is the author of Essentials of Corporate Fraud.
Recent Posts
- Penny-Pinching Picnics: Summer party tips that will save you money (7/04/2009)
- Live, from Walt Disney World, it's the Obamabot! (7/03/2009)
- Ukraine outlaws possession of porn, but can't define what it is (7/03/2009)
- Taken for a ride: 5 clever ways theme parks bleed you for extra (7/03/2009)
- Ask the Dolans: Is now the time to start my own business? (7/03/2009)

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 12)
10-09-2008 @ 7:49PM
peter vallorosi said...
This whole thing is a joke! How can AIG, a company that gets bailed out for so far 120 billion, even think that employees deserve or earned the trip. They would have been belly up if we, the taxpayers, had not saved their ass. It is like a baseball team losing a game 20-1 but giving the guy that scored the lone run a bonus. AIG failed as a company.
Reply
10-10-2008 @ 10:00PM
Yvonne said...
Heres the bottom line..You all have fallen victims to the media's crap. Did you all really read in detail what this article said? The loan wasn't just to save AIG as a company. The 'ultimate' goal of the government making that loan was to try to save our country and ultimately our world from falling into a great depression. That is exactly what could happen if the world's largest insurer bites the dust. People, the media is making money off of you. That is their only goal: to put blinders on the public and sell their crap.
10-10-2008 @ 11:29PM
Adiquet said...
AIG didn't fail as a company - they were insuring the banks that gave loans to people who could not afford the loans there were given because there we not explained about the inflating interests they would be charged. The bottom line - the banks / CEOs that approved all these loans should be fired and have to live their lives like the ones that are getting their houses foreclosed on.
Don't get me wrong - AIG should also fire all the representatives that on the last resort and they should have to pay back the US all the money spent on that trip.
A Piece of Mynd
10-11-2008 @ 12:51AM
keith said...
AIG being bailed out while seemingly sensible to lawmakers is reprehensible. The abuse of monies by execs should land them in bankruptcy court.
People cant fail financially and get bailed out, they cant even save the home they had foreclosed on. Peoples lives have been devastated by whims of people opening the floodgates to bad loans and wasteful corporate spending,
IN THIS WORLD , WE JAIL DEADBEAT PARENTS. BUT WE BAIL OUT DEADBEAT BUSINESSES AND WALL STREET MILLIONAIRES.
THESE PEOPLE RODE A WILD RIDE AND CRASHED BECAUSE THEY BASICALLY WERE INTOXICATED ON WEALTH.
WHEN WE ACCOMPLISH SUCH A DOUBLE STANDARD AS TO BAIL OUT THE RICH AND JAIL THE INDIGENT IN MAY CASE WE HAVE TRULY GOT SOME IGNORANT LAWMAKERS.
WHAT WILL BE NEXT ? AWARDS OF PAY RAISES , TRIPS AND THE LIKE FOR THE ALREADY SOLVENT?
THESE ISSUES DONT IMPACT MY LIFE , BUT FOR THE SAKE OF MANKIND WHAT HAVE WE DONE AND WHEN WILL WE WORRY ABOUT PEOPLE NOT WEALTHY BUSINESSES? iF aIG WENT UNDER, ANOTHER WOULD REPLACE IT.......IF A PERSON GOES UNDER, THEY STAY THERE FOR A LONG TIME WITH NO HELP.
CHARITY BEGINS AT HOME, WITH THE LESS FORTUNATE NOT THE WEALTHY WHILE THE POOR GET POORER.
SHAME ON OUR GOVERNMENT! OUR DEADBEAT GOVERNMENT!
10-11-2008 @ 4:18AM
Cathy said...
This package, nor any other package, is going to save the world financially or otherwise. The bailout was just another gimmic to ensure the ongoing class structure that has plagued mankind for a very long time. We, the tax payers who don't get to share in the write offs, are serfs and the wealthy bankers, political leaders, and business people are the kings and noblemen.
If after Clinton the US would have redistributed the wealth and responsibility a little more farily instead of living off of credit while selling us "Reganomical trickle down, I aint got wet yet economics", we'd be a lot stronger country right now. Oh, and lets not forget King George W's little personal war in Iraq becasue Sadamm threatened his daddy that is costing us how much a day? While his old budy (who had the same stock broker by the way and whose family was chaperoned out of the US the day after 9/11) Bin Lauden, is still at large.
10-09-2008 @ 8:49PM
Ann M. said...
Well it's certainly a reasonable assumption that outrage is the right feeling at a time like this, but the truth is that these types of incentives and training meetings are planned months and even years in advance and these nice hotels do huge business with groups and the contracts have hefty cancellation penalites. Airline tickets were purchased months ago as well, usually non-refundables (to save money). So as a person who works in the event Management business (training meetings and incentives). I can only tell you they would have still had to spend almost every dime - had they cancelled.. and I imagine they are hoping to hold on to their best producers.... if they are to have a future at all. Of course public perception is important, but as I said, most of the money was already spent in deposits on the hotel, etc. long ago and they wouldn't get anything for airline tickets either.
Reply
10-10-2008 @ 11:16AM
Pete said...
And you know this how.? You probably were one of the one scheduled for the spa. Stop justifying immoral spending !!!
10-10-2008 @ 9:01PM
Ann said...
I work in the meeting planning department of a fortune 100 company and we won't place a meeting with a hotel who won't sign our cancellation clause...
10-10-2008 @ 9:04PM
Fred said...
Sorry, Ann. I can't agree with you that AIG did the right thing by going ahead with the retreat. This is a big black eye for them with the public who are footing the bill to bail them out - a total public relations fiasco. Even if they had to pay the cancellation fees at the resort they would still have saved most of the meals and entertainment expense - which would not have been a small amount. The air fares could have been negotiated with the airlines for use at a later date, possibly with a small fee attached. I believe the public perception would have been more positive had they cancelled and announced that they did so due to their economic problems. If the "top producers" are too dumb to realize the state our of national financial situation, AIG would be better off without them.
10-10-2008 @ 9:12PM
sharol said...
while they were making these plans for their "Top producers" they were sinking deeper and deeper and should NEVER have gone forward with plans under the circumstances.
Bleeding hearts will not FIX this problem.
They are accountable ... and if their top producers lose out
on trip benefit, then so be it.
Dergulation does not translate into RAPE the public ....
and that's exactly what's happening to us. The high cost of insurance is CAUSED by all the perks given the multi-levels
of people. I'm sick of it and you should be too.
10-10-2008 @ 10:05PM
sowell said...
that bull sht...they have known the mess they were in for more than months... I say they should all be arrested for unconstitutional spending.
10-10-2008 @ 10:01PM
iwillbecauseiam said...
What on earth is the matter with you? You can't see how bad this looks to taxpayers living on beans and rice? I hope there is a special corner in Hel- for you along with the AIG execs.
10-10-2008 @ 11:38PM
vmp said...
Well why schedule these trips anyway? you have got to be kidding me that is a defense. Why don't they choose to not cancel it and send some people who have lost their jobs and homes to go in there place so they can know what the good life feels like before they are living under a bridge? or better yet-call all the people they have reservations with and ask them to refund the money to a college fund for all the kids that might not get to go due to their lavish producers who are so talentented that they have run their company into the ground?
10-18-2008 @ 12:52AM
Toolboxgeorge said...
As a person with considerable experience in the business world, I would like to take exception to the notion that AIG had no choice but to take the trip because they had already purchase the trip and facilities. I am list just three of the options they had.
1) Cancel the outing, agreeing to pay a cancellation fee (if necessary) and offering to pay for the part of the rooms and facilities that could not be sold at full or reduced rates.
2) Negotiate a flat charge of cost plus a reasonable mark-up in return for not cancelling the event.
3) Sell the booking themselves and reduce the expense to taxpayers. This action (IMO) is especially appropriate since it is exactly what every working taxper will have to do to pay the additional taxes to fund this fat cat bailout.
10-10-2008 @ 3:17AM
Mazie said...
this is wrong. People are struggling. Let us get it together
Reply
10-10-2008 @ 6:54AM
diTesco said...
In the business world, some of these benefits or "perks" are common and accepted. Especially if it is to reward people who have positively contributed towards the company's profitability. However, in rough time and in particular when you are in a need of a mere 120$ billion loan from the government, changes must be made and quickly. AIG has to set examples to regain the people and the markets trust. This type of spending is totally unacceptable and such extravaganza could already reduce the load to only, 119,5$ billion. AIG, once, All Is Greenberg, is today in the verge of being "All Is Gone", if they do not take immediate measures and cut, cut, cut, unnecessary spending.
Reply
10-10-2008 @ 8:08PM
J. Jones said...
These people don't know it, but I suspect that they will find that by accepting the government money they will be subjected to the Government Cost Accounting Standards. That means, $103 per night for hotel rooms, and $48 per day for all other expenses including meals. It means no private jets or first class flights. We should all write to our senators and representatives and insist that anyone who accepts money from the government be required to follow these standards.
Reply
10-10-2008 @ 8:17PM
Neil Morrison said...
AMEN, BROTHER!!!!
I happen to work in the insurance industry, and we get these trips, but, we are not in any trouble, as we do not handle home mortgages, only life and health.
What I want to know, is where do I sign up, so the government can bail me, out, and pay my bills!! :) No thanks, I will do it myself, as I do not want the government in my business, thank you! These companies, have brought this all on themselves, they were greedy!
10-10-2008 @ 11:26PM
Noob said...
And that's still too much. How about 30 for a room and 20 for food. Anything more comes out of their pocket. I'm sure these rich bastards can afford it anyway. Why is it the rich get so many privaledges?
I smell a war between the rich and the rest of the world brewing and it's not looking good for the rich.
10-10-2008 @ 8:10PM
mike said...
I vote that all the AIG personell shuoud be incarcerated.
Reply