Skip to Content

Starbucks' new healthy breakfasts: Worth the cash?

More
Text SizeAAA

Filed under: Food, Health

Lately, I've been on an oatmeal kick. My kids and I can't get enough, especially after I started investigating the health benefits of whole grains and learned the easiest, most delicious way to get those grainy nutrients: soak thick-cut oatmeal overnight with a bit of whey, buttermilk or raw milk and cook it in the morning. It takes less than a minute the night before, and only a few minutes of active work in the morning, and I serve my oatmeal with fresh fruit in season, chopped-up nuts from local farmers, organic maple syrup, organic raw milk. Even though I'm using the luxi-est ingredients available and paying retail prices (often from the farmer's market, which is a pricey-but-sustainable choice), each serving costs me less than $1.50.

Enter Starbucks and their "perfect oatmeal." For $2.45, I can pick two of three mix-ins -- dried fruit (sweetened with sugar), nuts or brown sugar. At $2.45 for what is essentially just a cardboard cup with some chopped-up grains, and with that smug name, I expected something great. After all, this whole line of foods is part of CEO Howard Schultz' mission to eat more healthy himself; his cholesterol and weight were deemed too high by his physician. Oatmeal does, after all, seem a sensible and quick alternative to other fast breakfasts, like doughnuts, Egg McMuffins, and the like.

But Howie! What's with all that sugar? And what's with the instant oatmeal? I tried a bowl and was flummoxed. First: it wasn't that good, what with the instant oats and the skim milk. Not only would you eat a lot of processed sugar were you to choose either brown sugar or dried fruit on your perfect oatmeal, using instant oats removes a lot of the good nutrients. So you'll be messing with your body's metabolism (processed sugars and highly-processed grains trick your body into thinking it wants more, causing overeating and directly contributing to weight gain), in addition to paying more than you could if you made it at home.

Making your own oatmeal is cheaper, better for you, and it will prevent you from thinking you need a pastry too... and a grande mocha... paying off huge in lower health costs down the road.
Subscribe to Walletpop

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)

Margarine or Butter: Which is Healthier?
Which is healthier? Margarine or butter? Liquid margarine is a healthier option, but if truth be ...
Ensuring a Safe Manicure and Pedicure
Millions of women (and a few men) visit nail salons regularly to have their nails done. ...

Barbara Bartlein
Barbara Bartlein Filed under: Budgets, Debt, Home, Real Estate

Extreme home makeover, Part V: $55,000 later, we're finally done

This is the last of a five-part series about how the writer and her husband, Charlie, tackled a major overhaul of their home and the pitfalls they faced along the way. To read the first installment ...
Barbara Bartlein
Barbara Bartlein Filed under: Budgets, Home, Real Estate, Wealth, Recession

Extreme home makeover, Part IV: Progress at last, but roadblocks remain

This is the fourth part of a five-part series about how the writer and her husband, Charlie, tackled a major overhaul of their home and the pitfalls they faced along the way. To read the first ...
Kelly Phillips Erb
Kelly Phillips Erb Filed under: Tax, Technology, Taxes-income-tax-basics, Taxes-advice

E-filing tips that should save time, if not money

If the trend in e-filing continues, the IRS expects more than 100 million individual taxpayers to file their tax returns electronically for the 2009 tax year. More than one-third of those taxpayers ...
Kelly Phillips Erb
Kelly Phillips Erb Filed under: Tax, Taxes-income-tax-basics, Taxes-advice

IRS' e-file program gaining users

Chances are, you filed your federal taxes electronically this year. According to the IRS, about two out of every three individual taxpayers elected to e-file in 2009, up almost 6% from returns ...

Headlines from WalletPop Partners