'Duh!' of the day: United loses $544 million betting on the fuel market
Filed under: Borrowing, Extracurriculars, Transportation, Travel, Recession, Bankruptcy

United Airlines, which has a management as sharp as a box of hammers and aging seating about as soft, thought it could imitate Southwest by getting into the hedging game, too. But, whoops! Timing is everything. It got in way too late, as the market prepared to peak. Prices went down. And right now it's paying almost $13 more a barrel than oil is actually worth, which could rack up as much as $544 million in boneheaded, unnecessary losses.
It's a lot like the guy down the street who bought his house a year ago for $400,000, only to find in this self-correcting market that it's now worth about $250,000, which everyone in the neighborhood knew was a more realistic price all along. He intended to flip it, but now he's got to live in it. Of course, if gas prices go back up a bit, United's loss may be mitigated slightly.
Dimwitted financial brinkmanship like this ends up costing consumers. Just last week, United doubled its fee for a second checked bag to $50 per flight. At the time, the excuse it gave (fuel prices) seemed feeble because everyone knows prices have descended in the past few weeks. But learning how the airline burned itself by playing a big boy's game makes its voracious need for fees a little more logical.
Also last week, United announced that it stands to reap $700 million from its despised new fees, which can double the sticker price of the average ticket. Now the income brought in by those fees isn't going to amount to much after the cost of hedging is deducted. So we should brace ourselves for even more fees.
United isn't the only carrier to get in too late on the fuel hedging game. Northwest locked in at a point that will have it losing cash if fuel goes below $112 in 2009. It already has. Right now, it's around $97.
Which all means some of the airlines, after slamming us with surcharges and baggage fees because fuel prices went up, are now in the ludicrous position of hoping gas gets more expensive again. It's to their benefit that oil prices actually rise. Personally, I'm always scared when powerful corporations stand to make money from circumstances that will penalize the rest of us. Sound familiar, Wall Street?
Update: Good news! Oil prices jumped $16.37 today. (Well, that's good news for United and Northwest, anyway.) Stay tuned to see if the price spike holds over time.
Recent Posts
- The best and worst of the online shopping cashback sites (11/19/2008)
- If nobody shops, nobody eats (11/19/2008)
- Craigslist hooks up dope users, dealers (11/19/2008)
- Boomers worry retirement won't be what they had hoped (11/19/2008)
- Black Friday roundup is back, Best Buy, Target, Staples and more (11/19/2008)

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-22-2008 @ 11:47PM
scott said...
Actually when you hedge you not only prevent potential losses but you also prevent any potential gains. In effect you cover yourself both ways and you always break even, hence this is why when someone bet both ways on who is going to win a football game its called "hedging your bets".
I don't know the particulars around this issue with United's fuel purchasing. However if they are hurting because fuel prices have dropped then they didn't "hedge", it sounds like speculative buying of oil futures perhaps but definitely NOT hedging.
But then again, shouldn't the author already know this? Oh yeah, he's not into finance, he's a reporter...
Reply
9-23-2008 @ 12:21AM
scott said...
Never mind my last post, I ran out of coffee and my mind went to sleep!
I soon as I hit send, I realized what was meant by the author and he is correct.
Hedging locks in the fuel price at a certain level and now fuel has dropped!
This is my Duh moment too!
Reply