Overrated: Is the Prius really worth it?
Filed under: Extracurriculars, Ripoffs and Scams, Saving, Technology, Transportation, Wealth
The first problem with the Prius is that it isn't just a car. When the engineers at Toyota began working on a hybrid, their course was probably very clear: they wanted to make a relatively inexpensive, moderately attractive piece of machinery that would go reasonably fast while sipping gas as carefully as Joe Lieberman's poison taster. Maybe they imagined that their car would gain a little cachet in the crunchy granola set, but their primary goal was to create affordable, moderately green transportation. They succeeded, of course, and produced a fine little car that does everything they wanted.
Then the marketing people got their greasy little hands on the Prius and everything went to hell.
Don't miss the rest of our series on Overrated people, places and things!
If your primary interest is in saving gasoline, the Prius is an outstanding bet. The 2008 model gets 48 mpg in the city and 45 mpg on the highway, making it the most fuel efficient car available in the US, according the EPA. Unfortunately, however, all of this fuel efficiency comes at a considerable cost: the price of a current Prius hovers somewhere in the $25,000 range, pushing it out of the range of many consumers. By comparison, a used 1990's Geo Metro gets 38 mpg in the city and 45 mpg on the highway, yet starts in the $2,000 range. For a fully refurbished model, purchasers can expect to pay $4,000-$5,000.
Of course, a used Geo just isn't all that sexy, which brings us to the heart of the Prius matter. While Toyota's wonder machine is great for saving gas, it's even better for improving one's social position. After all, there aren't a lot of cars that convey its mix of environmental awareness, sexy technology and trendy thriftiness. Admittedly, with the high cost of gas, a Prius will become a profitable purchase far earlier than comparable models, but that assumes that you are among the few people who are both willing and able to shell out $25,000 for a new car this year.
Bruce Watson is a freelance writer, blogger, and all-around cheapskate. All things considered, he sometimes thinks that Toyota should have named it the "Priapus."
Recent Posts
- The best and worst of the online shopping cashback sites (11/19/2008)
- If nobody shops, nobody eats (11/19/2008)
- Craigslist hooks up dope users, dealers (11/19/2008)
- Boomers worry retirement won't be what they had hoped (11/19/2008)
- Black Friday roundup is back, Best Buy, Target, Staples and more (11/19/2008)

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
9-11-2008 @ 7:58AM
playyme said...
this is the dumbest thing this idiot has ever written, compare apples to apples. You forget safety, airbags, warranties, reliability and resale value. Idiot idiot idiot idiot, you dont live in the real world my friend!
Reply
9-11-2008 @ 9:46AM
Bruce Watson said...
Geez, playyme, tell me how you really feel. It seems like you're holding a lot back!
9-11-2008 @ 10:37AM
Cali said...
I don't see what was wrong with Bruce stating how he felt. We are entitled to our opinions in the real world.
I also know many people buy the Prius to show it off, not because they actually give a hoot about the environment. And not all non Prius cars are bad for the environment.
Reply
9-11-2008 @ 10:46AM
Joe Mama said...
Funny how the author erases his credibility with his immature leftist digs at people with far superior intelligence than himself.
Reply
9-11-2008 @ 10:47AM
-Steven- said...
Bruce Watson clearly doesn't get it. Prius represents a very successful giant step away from the internal combustion engine. The remarkable efficiency of the electric regeneration built into this amazing vehicle is inevitable. Consumers support the movement. The day is soon coming when we will all laugh about cars that burned fuel when they were not moving. Prius owners are already laughing. Bruce proffers a Detroit mentality, but the marketplace will teach them both a lesson. The only reason Prius is so expensive is they can't make enough of them to meet the demand.
Reply
9-11-2008 @ 10:51AM
-Steven- said...
Bruce Watson clearly doesn't get it. Prius represents a very successful giant step away from the internal combustion engine. The remarkable efficiency of electric regeneration built into this amazing car is inevitable. Consumers are supporting the movement. Bruce proffers a Detroit mentality, but the marketplace will teach them both a lesson. The day is coming when we will all laugh about cars that burned fuel when they were not moving. Prius owners are already laughing. The only reason Prius is so expensive is because they can't make enough of them to meet the demand.
Reply
9-11-2008 @ 11:39AM
jennifer said...
I picked a hybrid (Escape) not just for reasonable miles per gallon but also because it releases few emissions into the environment.
Reply
9-11-2008 @ 11:45AM
Holly said...
I agree with the author. He is basically saying that "the emperor has no clothes." The Wall St. Journal ran an article that compared fuel efficiency and expense over several years between Prius and other fuel efficient quality cars (e.g. Honda) showing that over the life of the car, Prius will cost at least $3000 more AFTER fuel savings than a comparable non-hybrid car. It's all about the label.
Reply
9-20-2008 @ 8:57PM
Chan said...
Well, there are lots of people (and I'm one of them) who doesn't care about labels but is willing to work hard and pay more money in order to do less damage. I am a fiscal conservative; I don't buy much material stuff, I live in a small and adequate house, and incur as little debt as possible. My house, I bet, would never be described as "a label" -- three bedrooms and one bath for wife, me and two kids. But as a conservative, I think it's important to use less stuff. Why is my car making you angry? Sure, I had to spend more on it, but I had it to spend by being thrifty. Why so judgmental?
9-11-2008 @ 12:54PM
Susan said...
We bought our Prius because of the miles we drive during work hours . We also bought it because it's rear windows roll down . Most American cars don't offer this feature citing safety , but most likely it's being cheap. We have 200,000 trouble free miles on it and would buy another in a second ! Our work hours are at night so not many people see the car to shop it off to .
Reply
9-11-2008 @ 12:57PM
Susan said...
What a stupid comparison ! Why not compare a used Prius with a new Geo ? We bought our new Prius in 2005 and have 200, 000 miles on it . Trouble free miles ,fist set of front brakes at 144,000 miles ! It has carried lumber, feed ,hay and 5 passengers . It also has made it's own payments in gas savings .....
Reply
9-11-2008 @ 6:31PM
Jason said...
Starting at $22k, you get a mid-size car that is the most fuel efficient in the U.S, is a super ultra low emissions vehicle, and gets 4 and 5 stars on frontal, side and rollover crash ratings. The battery pack has an 8 year, 100,000 mile warranty (higher in California and some NE states). Comparing this car to the Geo Metro is stupid.
Reply
9-11-2008 @ 7:59PM
Sweet T said...
"Prep appeal" or not, this is really a fine car to get around in, city or highway ! My (elderly) neighbor has a 2004. Over the years, I've ferried her or family to the airport and back, and used it whole my car was getting fixed for a day or so.
Her son has the '09 on order for her; she's LHAO and can't wait because she likes what she calls "the granny cam" feature it'll have. I told her to remember to look ahead every now and again. ;~)
Reply
9-12-2008 @ 10:14PM
ray said...
I had a Geo, I bought it new and it never on its best day got 38 MPG. Someone didn't do his homework.
Reply
9-13-2008 @ 9:09AM
Bill said...
I know two people that own a Prius and have had the opportunity to both ride in and drive them. My impression was that the Prius is with out a doubt the biggest POS I have ever been in. Between the road noise, wind noise and lack of power you might as well ride your bike. My daily driver only gets 15 mpg and that's on premium only but I'd rather pay the price and be comfortable and safe. The price of gas DOES NOT determine what I drive.
Reply
9-13-2008 @ 9:59AM
myyrhnn said...
Let's look at hybrid cars in this light. A prius gets 45 mpg, a used Honda civic or Toyota tercel get 35 mpg. Based on the national average of 15,000 miles per year, the used car cannot keep up with the prius and will use 90 gallons more fuel per year than the prius. However the cost to manufacture the prius uses 1,000 gallons of fuel. And by driving the used car that is already on the road. One avoids the environmental impact of building a new one. In fact it will take about 10 years for the hybrid to catch up with the old car in total energy cosumption.
And the used car costs $20,000 less than the prius. So really who is being better to the environment the person who spends a lot of money on a newly manufactured car. Or the person that buys a reusable car that requires no new energy to build.
Reply
9-14-2008 @ 1:03PM
JR said...
Buy American. We purchased a Ford Hybrid, and like it.
Reply
9-14-2008 @ 8:59PM
Jean said...
Great idea JR!!!!!!
9-18-2008 @ 4:56PM
paul said...
JR & JEAN, The Ford ESCAPE HYBRID is old toyota technology, Toyota sold to FORD years ago, so the Prius is a far superior vehicle, and will be built here in the USA by 2010.
Reply
9-18-2008 @ 5:54PM
Mark said...
Oh, Paul...read a little, will ya? Ford's technology did not come from Toyota. Toyota and Ford developed the same type of technology simultaneously and, due to possible patent infringements on BOTH sides, they agreed to share it along with some of Ford's diesel and injection technology.
It never ceases to amaze me when a Japanese car owner makes outlandish claims like this based on zero fact. But, then again, what would one expect from people who think that paying $25,000 for a subcompact is a great deal because it gets about 30% more mileage than a conventional vehicle of similar size which costs half as much? They don't even realize that "hybrid" technology is almost as old as the automobile itself and has been used in diesel-electric locomotives for decades. Ah, the folly of the ignorant and misinformed...
Reply