When it comes to food, package size matters
Choosy mothers should probably choose Jif if they want to scrape more peanut butter out of a standard-size jar. According to CNN, competing sandwich spread Skippy is among numerous brand names that have quietly shrunk the size of their packaging as a means of passing on food inflation to consumers.
While the Skippy jar remains the same height and diameter as it did when it contained a full 18 ounces of peanut butter, a deeper indentation on the bottom accounts for the loss of 1.7 ounces. Meanwhile, the most significant change Jif has made to its packaging is on the label, where large type alerts consumers to the fact that this jar is still 18 ounces strong.
A New Look for Old Brands
What changed: The 400-location hotel worldwide hotel chain is in the middle of a $1.7 billion project to renovate about half its U.S. hotels. The new look includes brighter colors in the room, with pillowtop beds and white duvets and flat-screen TVs. Sheraton is rolling out a branded line of toiletries, called Shine by Bliss, and fitness centers will get upgrades. Lobbies will feature restaurants, most with a casual dining chain called Relish, and cafes with Internet stations. Some locations may also have a steakhouse developed by Shula's.
AP
What changed: Now owned by Stride Rite, which re-acquired the rights to the sneaker brand from hip-hop mogul Damon Dash (a recent foreclosure victim), PRO-Keds are going to get a makeover as they come back into the fold. Stride Rite will focus on classic styles, such as the "Royal" canvas basketball shoe, first introduced in 1949, and give it an overhaul that will hit stores in November and retail for $50 to $80.
ProKeds.com
What changed: Hasbro updated the 60-year-old game of Clue with changes that include a fancy new mansion with a spa and theater, and new weapons like a baseball bat and an ax. Professor Plum is now an Internet billionaire and Colonel Mustard is a former football star, and the murder mystery takes place during a party for the rich and famous. The game structure has also changed somewhat, with the addition of a second deck of cards, which is supposed to add an extra element of surprise.
Hasbro
What changed: Little girls have been inundated with Disney princess paraphernalia for years now, and the line has been so popular that the company wants to try to do the same thing with fairies. Tinker Bell, a mere side character in J.M. Barrie's 1911 novel and the 1953 movie version of Peter Pan, is going to soon be a leading lady. A straight-to-DVD movie, Tinker Bell, comes out October 28, and that will be followed by a line of books, toys, lip gloss and stationary. The new line could mean big bucks as Tink already brings in about $800 million in retail sales for existing products.
AP | Disney
What's changed: Strawberry Shortcake got more than just a new dress or two when she got a makeover earlier this year (just before American Greetings sold the rights to the character to a Canadian company). The '80s icon got a total makeover that includes a few nips and tucks to her physique as well changes to her makeup. She will now spend a lot of time talking on her cell phone and eating fresh fruit in an effort to appeal to a new generation of young girls. A new animated movie and TV series are slated for 2009.
American Greetings
What changed: Holiday Inn is in the process of a $1 billion makeover of its hotel locations as well as its logo. About 100 properties will leave the chain, while about 1,000 hotels will be added over the next three years. Existing locations will be upgraded in ways big and small from improved infrastructure to "triple-sheet" bedding. All locations that are spruced up will get the new logo, which will be a stylized white H on a green square, rather than the green script familiar from most highway views.
AP
What changed: A new global version of Monopoly Here & Now replaces the streets of Atlantic City with world metropolises like Taipei, Cape Town and the Latvian capital of Riga, which nabbed the Park Place spot in a round of online voting. Hasbro's new board game, which will be printed in 37 languages, goes on sale next week. You'll still be able to find the original version on sale, but the game maker is trying to attract a global audience with this new version.
Ray Stubblebine, Hasbro / AP
What changed: Xerox has one of those special brand names that has become the common name of a product or process -- in this case photocopying documents. But in 2008, after 40 years of the same boxy, bland look, the company decided it needed a makeover and it rolled out a new logo and branding campaign. Now, the logo has a red sphere attached to it that is supposed to symbolize the brand's worldwide reach and rounded lower-case letters.
Xerox
What changed: Wal-Mart keeps growing larger and larger, but it is also experimenting with getting smaller at the same time. The giant retailer is starting a pilot program of four small Marketside stores in Phoenix, Ariz., and if the concept works it could expand to ten stores, and then perhaps 1,000. The new stores, only 15,000 square feet, will offer groceries and other fresh items that shoppers can get to quickly. Wal-Mart also is testing six Neighborhood Market stores in Tulsa using the same concept of a smaller space and a focus on fresh food.
Wal-Mart
What's changed: Ethical concerns about how young calves are raised for food have curtained veal consumption in recent years, but a new campaign is trying to tout the beef product, at least for high-end buyers. "Certified Humane" meat packers raise calves in group housing, which means they are free to move about in pens, and are fed some grain rather than all milk. The resulting veal is sold in specialty butcher shops, for now, and commands only 5 to 10 percent of the veal market.
Other slimmed-down packages include:
A box of Kellogg's Apple Jacks, down from 11 to 8.7 oz.;
A can of Starkist tuna, shrunk from 6 to 5 oz.;
A bottle of Tropicana orange juice, which sports a new snap cap that's supposed to make up for the fact that you're getting 7 oz. less liquid; and
A "half-gallon" container of Breyers Ice Cream, which now holds 48 oz. instead of 64.
Consumers are catching on. In a nationwide Consumer Reports survey in July, 75% of respondents said they noticed packages are shrinking, and 71% believed the main reason for downsizing was to hide price hikes from consumers. Still, half of those surveyed said they'd prefer that manufacturers keep the old package and raise the price.
Edgar Dworsky, editor of mouseprint.org, a consumer education Web site that examines advertising's fine print, suggests checking and comparing the unit prices in the grocery store and opting for the brand that offers the most value. In other words, even those of us without children should be choosy mothers when it comes to buying food.
Recent Posts
- Rebate processor goes out of business taking your rebates with it (11/20/2008)
- State colleges cut students and budgets but hike salaries for top staff (11/20/2008)
- New toilets help stop flushing dollars away (11/20/2008)
- 10 huge retail rip-offs you can no longer afford to ignore, despite your cravings (11/20/2008)
- The best and worst of the online shopping cashback sites (11/19/2008)

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 8)
9-15-2008 @ 6:56AM
betty said...
I've noticed a number of products are the same price but contain less. Tuna is one that has done that over the years. I hope they don't cut it much more...there won't be enought in a can to make one decent sandwich.
Reply
9-15-2008 @ 7:29AM
Wm. Morris said...
Betty I share your dismay, but the bread size has also shrunk, about everything from the Big Mac which is more like the Big Biscuit now to discovering the OJ with two different size containers in the cooler the same price, identical except for size, evidently the salesmanager forgot to instruct his troops not to mix the containers displaying the sham. I know Corp. America considers us stupid, I figure they must have learned it from our government who have made an art of deception and greed. I guess its time we hear its all for our own good, we are a nation of fatties, enough starvation will fix that. I'll ask my doctor when I can afford to see him.
9-15-2008 @ 8:45AM
Elana said...
It might be a blessing in disguise for most Americians, whose portion sizes have grown in size for decades. This is one way to fight the obsesity epidemic, through people's wallets.
9-15-2008 @ 1:46PM
mary said...
And we won't be able to use tuna in recipes anymore - most recipes I have call for a 7 to 7 1/2 ounce size can!
9-15-2008 @ 6:31PM
marion said...
KROGER STILL PUTS 6 OZS. IN THERE BRAND!TRY IT YOU'LL LIKE IT!
9-15-2008 @ 7:39PM
tony20hd said...
WORKING FOR ONE OF THOSE COMPANY"S THAT DID THIS I"LL SAY THIS .. WALMART!!!!!!
THEY WILL NOT ACCEPT ANY PRICE INCREASES FROM THIER SUPPLIERS. SINCE WALMART IS 30 -TO 35 % OF OUR BUSNIESS YOU HAVE TO RECOUP THE 6% TO 9% COST INCREASE SOMEWAY .
THATS WHY ITS SO WIDE SPREAD . MOST COMPANIES HAVE NO OTHER WAY TO RECOUP RISING COSTS......
9-15-2008 @ 6:59AM
Debra said...
The public is being "dupped" all the time by big industry. Their only concern is making money...never mind that they're ripping our eyes out or killing us slowly with generically processed foods. We, the public, in big numbers, have SOO much power and rarely use it. Boycotting is one way to stop these companies from screwing us. False advertising is a crime. I love Ms. Butterworth who says her syrup is so thick...my daughter and I went to the store and just tilted over one of those bottles and the syrup was soooo thin and liquidy. How do they get away with this? Oh, I know, the person who is supposed to be watching out for us, is taking money under the table to keep quiet. Niceeeee.
Reply
9-15-2008 @ 7:32AM
Gary said...
I wouldn't say the public is being "duped" as much as they are just unknowingly absorbing the increasing costs of transporting and packaging of the goods they buy. High oil prices affect the manufacturing process as much as the transporting of goods and manufacturers don't want to turn consumers away from their products by highly visible price increases.
Be a smart shopper. Choose generics over name brands. When you buy name brands, YOU are paying for their advertising costs and nothing more. Many generics are just as good or even better than their name brand counterparts.
If you buy only name brand products, then you ARE being "duped" into believing advertising campaigns at the expense of your own wallet.
9-15-2008 @ 8:54AM
Amy said...
I agree with Gary. I shop at stores like Aldi and Sav-A-Lot (I don't know if all states have them or not, I live in Ohio) which sell very good quality products for much less than you would pay for name brands at a regular grocery store. When I do shop at a regular store I almost always buy store brands or generics. Most of them are identical to the name brand, you're just not paying for the name. There are some things I refuse to buy generic (mostly household and hygeine products such as shampoo, dish liquid, laundry detergent) but these I buy at dollar stores. It may seem comical to be so cheap, but it really saves a lot of money. People should quit being "choosy" snobs and just do what makes sense...and cents.
9-15-2008 @ 11:43AM
Brenda said...
Gary, you must not know what good food is. Ever notice how generic canned tomatoes/tomato paste taste like the aluminum can they are packaged in? Generic food may be edible, but as a chef, I know the importance of using quality ingredients, and rarely do generics every qualify. I am paying for quality food, not the name brand. If the generic brands made a peanut butter that tastes exactly like Jif, I would buy it. Notice how generic veggies are full of tough parts, discolored pieces and inedible ends? You're wasting your money having to throw away half of those.
Most generic foods do not qualify to be in my kitchen. You can go ahead and eat that junk, but I'll stick with the good stuff. My grandmother still says that nobody can possibly taste the difference between margarine and butter. Perhaps you think the same? I won't buy margarine either, which has the same ingredients as plastic and is full of water.
9-15-2008 @ 4:04PM
Jules said...
Come now Brenda, you want people to believe margarine is made out of crude oil like plastics? On average the quality of store brands and top name brands are not all that different as many are packaged in the same plant by the same company but with a different label depicting the store that is sell it for a lower price. As for peanut butter, which I do not use often, I would not waste my money are all the added junk in most of the name brands. Give me natural peanut butter any day (Kirkland Brand). As a chef you should know most value brands are not all that much different than name brands and are processed in much the same manner, often in the same locations. Learn your facts rather than attempting to encourage people to spend inflated prices for the same product. (BTW I hope I never eat where you are chef, as I would not want to pay the extra for brand names in the thought I am receiving a better final product).
9-15-2008 @ 7:17AM
Monty Python 1975 said...
The biggest offenders yet, by far, has to be the coffee companies. The only coffee that still comes in a ONE pound package is Dunkin Donuts, but not from the super markets; only at the Dunkin Donuts Shops.
Reply
9-15-2008 @ 7:17AM
Monty Python 1975 said...
The biggest offenders yet, by far, has to be the coffee companies. The only coffee that still comes in a ONE pound package is Dunkin Donuts, but not from the super markets; only at the Dunkin Donuts Shops.
Reply
9-15-2008 @ 12:44PM
charlyhaus said...
Brenda~
Most every human being knows exactly what good quality food is. The sad reality is, we can't afford $4.00 per pound tomatoes, and so on.
Most generic canned food as of recent have drastically improved in quality and the so-called named brands have reduced in quality and quantity. It just depends on where you buy it from.
You say you are "paying for quality food, not the name brand." If it's not generic, you may be getting quality food, but you are still paying for the label and the advertising that goes with it.
It doesn't take a chef to know how to take a group of generic foods and make a gourmet meal out of it while saving money and keeping the family fed.
9-15-2008 @ 7:42AM
Wm. Morris said...
Dear Debra: I for years thought the FDA was a watch dog for the public's interest, making sure our food and drugs where safe, considering the drug industries scandles someone needs to be active in the public's interest! Mainly the FDA is in place to limit legal liability of the drug companies, the checks that accompany the self imposed testing, and believe it or not this testing is always favorable toward retailing of said drugs, go figure? Are not meant to buy influence (Huh?) they are to cover the cost of our desk jocky reading these reports and rubber stamping them. I never cease to be amazed at the worthless agencies our taxes support.
Reply
9-15-2008 @ 7:45AM
Tara said...
I think that the most drastic one I've found is the Walmart brand frozen lasagnas. It USED to be a 9 lb. lasagna for about 10 dollars. Well, the lasagna must have went on Jenny Craig, because it lost 3 lbs. BUT it is still 10 bucks! All of this just makes me feel so warm and cozy...especially when my fiance has to drive an 1 and 1/2 hours to get to work (one way!). Well, we can't afford a Hybrid, so we get about 25 mpg. It's an outrage! Can't afford to eat, and can't afford getting to the grocery store, which is another 35 miles round trip! Then, we can barely afford to get to work! My fiance figured it up, that by the time you subtract the cost of gas for the commute to work, he only makes $80 more than he would make if he was claiming his unemployment! This is RIDICULOUS!
Reply
9-15-2008 @ 8:13AM
Annie said...
I agree. I agree. Are we only talking about food here or can one mention another necessity? I refer to toilet paper manufacturers. They have become the super stars of fluffing. The purveyers of much air for a whole lot of money.
Reply
9-15-2008 @ 8:29AM
bearskyt said...
Pretty soon you'll be buying potato chips by the chip...no joke! Aside from our own vigilence isn't there some truth in advertising that requires manufacturers to prominently call attention to a change in size, quantity, number of servings ingredients, etc. It's time for a change. What prevents Skippy from making a "peanut butter" from with out any peanuts?
Reply
9-16-2008 @ 5:09AM
ALEX said...
What do you think CREAMY peanut butter is? LOL
9-15-2008 @ 8:49AM
Sharon said...
The companies have been downsizing products for years. It's nothing new. People must be proactive and pay attention to what is happening in their world.
Years ago, people lived close to their work place. Surely we will go back to that strategy. Everyone needs a priority list. Having it all is just too expensive.
Reply