Foreclosures hit renters hard too
Filed under: Real Estate, Ripoffs and Scams
Despite the relative risk aversion most people associate with renting a house, the ever rising number of foreclosures has been hurting tenants, sometimes even harder than landlords. In most cases the tenants don't even know that the landlord has been failing to make payment until they receive the foreclosure or eviction notice on their front door. From there, the renter's rights vary from state to state with the protections generally being lackluster. To top off the need to quickly find a new place to stay as the bank takes ownership, many tenants are also out a month's rent and the security deposit.One renter in Virginia lost $1,200 when her landlord was foreclosed on; a hardship which coupled with the loss of her roommate and access to transportation has left her 6 months pregnant living in a homeless shelter. Some states do provide protections which will allow the renters to pay the bank and live in the home until the new owner moves in but the extra time for tenants isn't usually long enough. In some other areas legal aides actually recommend living in the home rent free while the foreclosure process is completed in order to build up enough money for a new rental. No matter where you live the protections for renters from indiscriminate landlords are not good enough.
The House passed a measure last year which would afford more protection to renters in foreclosure cases but the measure hasn't yet been put into place. Congress needs to stop wasting time with credit card interchange fees and baseball steroid scandals and get on to passing something which I think we can all agree protects consumers. In these cases the foreclosures are especially sad because the displaced renters aren't the irresponsible ones; they have paid their rent and made the smart decision to not buy a home they cannot afford. Congress, quit carrying on about an energy plan for one day, leave your fly fishing trip early and get some protections passed. It'd be great if for once we could reward those individuals who made good decisions when it comes to housing.
Recent Posts
- Changing careers: Tips from someone who's been there (11/22/2008)
- What's out: Bar hopping. What's in: Pre-gaming. (11/22/2008)
- More Black Friday news: Kohl's is the lastest to promise steep discounts (11/21/2008)
- On Sunday, Dr Pepper gives America a free soda...thanks to Axl Rose (11/21/2008)
- Now's another good time to sell your gold (11/21/2008)

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-09-2008 @ 10:35PM
Nadine said...
I am in that very sad situation, here in California. My 4 unit building was sold about 18 months ago. The new owners thought they could keep it for a year then sell and make a profit. They bought at the wrong time. We got a notice stating the building had been foreclosed, and the new owner was offering $500 "cash for keys" if we agreed to get out in 30 days. We had 24 hours to call and confirm or make a counter proposal. I called their rep and asked for $1200 (not our last month & security amounts)and at least 2 months. We are resigned to stay at lest 3 months to save and find a suitable place. In our state, it takes roughly 3-6 months for an eviction, so stated the banks rep. I'll stay as long as I can, and try to recoup our security deposit. This coming Monday, I plan on going to my local legal aid center to get their advise, or at least the proper court documents filled out with the correct verbage, ready to be filed at a moments notice
Reply
8-10-2008 @ 8:17PM
FlippersSuck said...
That is why you research your landlord these days.
I would also look into "squatters rights" if my LL was foreclosed on.
It would take a lot more than $500 (or even $1200) cash for keys to move and being that there are so many homeowners that are staying in their houses for free now that the banks have so many of them that I wouldn't feel guilty in the least about not paying rent.
Renters are already paying for stupid homeowner decisions.
Reply
8-12-2008 @ 10:20PM
Tone said...
Isn't what the landlords are doing called theft by deception? They intentionally received funds that they had no intention of paying the bank or mortgage co.
Reply