All I can say is that from personal experience, I disagree. Whether it is blatant discrimination against women or just the way our society still treats women in the workforce, there is a glass ceiling. Can women overcome it? Yes, hopefully - it depends on how much gumption you've got and if you are willing to keep moving on until you find a firm with management that support you and advance you based on your qualifications and experience, no matter your sex.

The GAO, among other entities, has done studies and has found stats reflecting the reality that serious pay discrimination still exists.

See information here:

http://usgovinfo.about.com/lr/women_s_pay_discrimination/50470/1/

or here:
http://usgovinfo.about.com/cs/censusstatistic/a/womenspay.htm

There are more studies that you can find...

Reply

I will disagree as well, from personal experience. It's like saying that color or ethnic background discrimination doesn't exist either. I agree with 8P, you are right. Saying that women are solely to blame takes pressure off of sexist companies that "do" think that way about women. As long as women are treated as second class citizens in this country and around the world there WILL be workplace discrimination Miss Tracy.

Reply

There are some sexist places out their but i personally know a woman that makes over 110k so I totally agree.

Reply

There are likely many reasons women make less in certain circumstances . It is very rare that one thing causes or is even the biggest cause of issues such as pay inequity. I know of many women in my life , in fact most of them, who have quit work , stayed at home, or went part-time. It only makes sense that the amount they can demand will be lessened unless they continued their education or increased their skills while not working.

Women that think they are worth more simply need to negotiate more. If a worker is of higher value the employer will need to increase the salary to keep that person. Most employers realize this. Sure there are a few jerks out there but when it comes down to it , just as you and I do in both our personal and business lives, we will pay the least we can.

Also, please note that men work jobs that are far more dangerous. I believe men are dominant in the top 24 of the top 25 most dangerous jobs. Also I suggest you see this article and chart:http://www.menstuff.org/issues/byissue/dangerousjobs.htm

Reply

Prove it.

Reply

All I can say is, as a man, I believe that the real problem is the growing discrimination against men by women in the office. This problem will only compound as more women than men enter white collar work in the next ten years (since more women go to college than men now). On the whole, men do eveything in their power not to appear discriminatory toward women. Not only that but having worked with female bosses I can honestly say they are simply harder for men to deal with. I say bring women back to the kitchen. I am tired of working for them. I would sooner move to another country than work for another female boss.

Reply

So they have the young girls backing up their non-discrimination myth. These girls have to do this to keep their jobs. The fact that a woman cannot express herself on the job and has to tow the company male line is discrimination. Two years ago I worked in an office where I trained a young man who was younger than my oldest son and later found out he was making $4000 a year more than I was making. I had more education and experience than he did. I practically had to do his job and mine. I cried when I found out he made more. I loved my job and they really showed me what they thought of me. I immediately found another job for myself and contacted the EEOC about the discrimination. After having to stay after these people for 6 months, the EEOC finally got the company records and because he technically worked in another department there was nothing I could do. After I left, the young man wound up being fired because he didn't do anything. I was doing all the work. All you have to do is look at the current Presidential election. Hillary Clinton had the support of the people but Obama had the male dominated media in his back pocket. This current election has brought to the service again the big discrimination felt by all women.

Reply

I can only speak from my experience. I had more experience, took less time off, worked longer hours, achieved a hire profit, and better over all productivity with my team. I was also the lowest paid of 11 people in the same title and the same store, most of whom were men. I found that (even though we were not supposed to discuss our salary) new hire men with little or no experience were hired making up to $7000 more per year, then I was after 3 years of working with the company, and they were more then happy to tell and even complain about their paychecks. When raises were handed down each year, I know for a fact that at least once three of the men were given 4% raises, while two of the women including myself were only given 2%.

So as I can only speak from my experience, I know for a fact that there was discrimination in that particular organization, and heave heard from others that this same situation goes on in their work places.

Reply

This article is lame, if not extremely naive and biased! I am a female, under 40, worked for the same corporation for 20 years. I clawed my way up the ladder, refused to accept when a man of less experience and commitment was promoted before me, especially since I had a proven record of increasing revenue and was given several awards for achievement, yet that did not stop them from trying! At one point I gave my notice, in writing, stating the reason for leaving. Within a day, human resource dept. was calling me, within a week, I was given the promotion and my resignation withdrawn. Some try to slam the door on women no matter what they do. The point is, FIGHT BACK!

Reply

I firmly believe this is a myth. It's just basic economics that if women could be employed across the board at cut rate salaries, no employer in their right mind would bother to hire more expensive men. Employers are concerned with the bottom line and women would be the best game in town if the salary gap actually existed.

I took years off to stay home and raise my kids. Should I be surprised that my paycheck may not match some male co-workers who have put in the hours, enhanced their skills, made the contacts, and have an uninterrupted work history? I don't think so.

Reply

Overall women earn less money only because women seek out the easier, safer and less physical jobs.
It is far easier to work in a physicians office or as a real estate broker...than as a trucker, roofer, commercial fisherman, logger, utility pole worker, coal miner etc..
I am positive that women workers who are high rise metal workers that are framing skyscrapers earn the same on that job as their male counterparts...but few women want suck physical and danerous employment. There are some women who want the wages of a male and they are willing to do hard, dirty, dangerous physical labor...to earn higher wages, but those women are few and far between.

Reply

I once worked in a highly female workfield and you need to believe there were all sorts of hiring and promotion discrimination shown to the males in the field. Yet, no one admits this sexism goes on. Nor, is it publicly recognized that women can be just as sexist, albeit in sometimes more subtle ways, as men.

And as far as management style, women can get nastier and more micro managing than men, big-time! A "kinder-gentler" workplace with women at the helm is one of the biggest workplace hoaxes of our time.

Yet, the logic was, "there are no men in the field, because the salaries are so low, ergo, the salaries are so low because there are no men in the field." With that as an excuse, nobody bother to address the real issues of how the field was publicly perceived and how they could professionalize it. Nor, was there any thought as to how an estrogen-rich working environment was not attractive to men, anymore than a testosterone-fueled working environment was attractive to women.

Reply