Mortgage Confidential: Fed's new sub prime rules will have little effect
Filed under: Real Estate, Mortgage Confidential
Late last year, the Fed approved some new mortgage guidelines as part of a broad effort to fix the housing woes. These guidelines, aimed at the sub prime mortgage industry:
- Requires lenders to determine the borrower's ability to repay a mortgage loan by using the highest potential mortgage payment during the first seven years of the loan.
- Ban "no verification" loans -- meaning lenders must now verify both income as well as assets.
- Ban prepayment penalties if the payment could change any time during the first four years of the new loan.
- Require insurance and tax escrow accounts, called "impound" accounts in many parts of the country.
There. That will fix those mean old sub prime lenders. No more sub prime lenders making bad loans to people who can't afford them. Yeah, that'll teach 'em. The problem is, just exactly who will these new rules apply to, hmmm? I don't see any sub prime lenders, they're all out of business. Went away last year. Can anyone say, "too little, too late?"
Hey, I'm as cynical as the next guy, but these rules needed to be in place five years ago when sub prime lenders began testing waters they never swam in.
Sub prime mortgages have been around for years, when the interest rates on those loans were higher than conventional and government notes to offset the additional credit risk. But even then, sub prime loans required some down payment. Depending upon the credit grade, sub prime loans could require 20% or more down. I can pick out lots of areas in our country right now that could have benefited from requiring 20% down, at least someone can refinance when values drop.
But these new rules won't help anyone because there are no sub prime lenders to be found. Okay, there might one or two left, but the sub prime mortgages they offer look more like a regular loan and are nothing near to what they used to be one, two or even 10 years ago.
It's easy to look in the rear view mirror, we all do it. But the fact is that the horse already left the barn on this one some time ago. I watched the Fed announcement on these new rules and was just wondering how much those committee members got paid to come up with rules like, "Make sure they can afford the loan." Goodness gracious.
Real estate finance expert David Reed is president of CD REED Mortgage Bankers in Austin, TX and author of Mortgage Confidential: What You Need to Know That Your Lender Won't Tell You and Mortgages 101: Quick Answers to over 250 Critical Questions About Your Home Loan.




Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-21-2008 @ 8:59AM
Jim said...
As a due diligence underwriter for the last 15 years, I witnessed the evolution of the "if your breathing you've got a mortgage loan" era. Today we are all now trying to catch our collective breaths after the free fall of the mortgage industry. I knew I was reviewing junk loans, but if they met guidelines, hey it's okay and the investment bankers were lining up to buy this crap. Once the house of cards started to collapse, the bankers turned on the originators with a vengence, demanding loan buy backs. That was the death of sub prime lenders. Whole lot of finger pointing going on, but good old fashion GREED by all is to blame. Congress is little late to the party or should I say funeral with their new regulations.
Reply
7-31-2008 @ 11:42PM
Annie said...
Right there with you Jim....
These subprime lenders did this to themselves, along with the Traders who were advised what they were buying, just didn't want to hear it. Too little, too late is an understatement!
7-24-2008 @ 7:29AM
anthony russo said...
Is there any solution for someone like myself who owes now more than my income can afford and was given a prepay penalty on top . my credit score is also bad . my homes value was probally inflated .
Reply
7-24-2008 @ 3:43PM
BARB said...
In Michigan I was told if you were going to buy a home and were a first time homebuyer that in michigan you would be offered the 5%michca interest on the loan for the house as long as your credit was in good standing. True or not??
Reply
7-24-2008 @ 3:43PM
BARB said...
In Michigan I was told if you were going to buy a home and were a first time homebuyer that in michigan you would be offered the 5%michca interest on the loan for the house as long as your credit was in good standing. True or not??
Reply