Why shouldn't student lenders be able to decide who to lend to?
Filed under: Borrowing, College
Senate Democrats have introduced a bill that would require lenders that participate in the federal loan program to lend money to any eligible student, without taking into account factors like income or the kind of college a student is attending. The bill is being introduced after outcry over the number of lenders that have elected to stop offering student loans for community college.
This is wrong in a bunch of ways. As Pat Watkins, director of financial aid at Eckerd College, told the New York Times, "Banks are not philanthropic agencies" and that if banks are required to make unprofitable loans, "a lot of the banks will just say, we're out of the business completely, you pushed us out."
That won't do a lot to help the "student lending crisis" that is making national headlines. In the long run, strong arming private companies into making loans they don't want to make won't do a lot to help anyone, and is likely to hurt the people it is designed to help: students.
But, as I recently wrote, a decline in the availability of loans for community colleges might actually be good for some students, as they'll pay for college in better ways: working more and being frugal. But in the meantime, lenders should be allowed to make the loans that make sense, and shouldn't be forced to make bad loans or no loans at all.
This is wrong in a bunch of ways. As Pat Watkins, director of financial aid at Eckerd College, told the New York Times, "Banks are not philanthropic agencies" and that if banks are required to make unprofitable loans, "a lot of the banks will just say, we're out of the business completely, you pushed us out."
That won't do a lot to help the "student lending crisis" that is making national headlines. In the long run, strong arming private companies into making loans they don't want to make won't do a lot to help anyone, and is likely to hurt the people it is designed to help: students.
But, as I recently wrote, a decline in the availability of loans for community colleges might actually be good for some students, as they'll pay for college in better ways: working more and being frugal. But in the meantime, lenders should be allowed to make the loans that make sense, and shouldn't be forced to make bad loans or no loans at all.
Recent Posts
- Ask the Dolans: Should I re-address my estate planning documents when I move? (8/29/2008)
- Urgent safety matter: popular bassinet kills two infants (8/29/2008)
- Smithsonian's Museum Day - hundreds of local museums to offer free admission Sept 27th (8/29/2008)
- Are you ready for pay as you go car insurance? (8/29/2008)
- Fantastic Freebies: Love your mom and get a free movie rental (8/29/2008)

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-18-2008 @ 7:53PM
Haley said...
The difference between student loans and other loans is that the Federal Government pays banks and student loan providers a subsidy to make these loans using taxpayer money. The government pays student loan providers to make student loans because providing access to higher education is an important investment in the nation's future. Because these banks are guaranteed a subsidy on these loans, even if students fail to repay the loan, the federal government has a right to insist that lenders provide loans to all students - not just the students that they can make the greatest profit from.
Reply
6-20-2008 @ 12:02PM
Artemis said...
Sure, lenders can decide who to lend to...when they stop taking Federal money. Subsidies and guarantees by the Feds = playing by the Feds' rules.
Reply