Selective breeding: Helping rich men meet trophy wives
Filed under: Sex Sells, Entrepreneurship, Extracurriculars, Simplification, Career, Wealth, Relationships
We've all seen the story, and we know how it goes: a young model finds herself staring down the barrel of 27, the age at which the fashion industry ties models to trees and gives them the Old Yeller treatment. Somehow, using her charm and beauty, she manages to snag a rich man with poor social skills, and the two begin the dance of courtship, American-style. Prenups are signed, wedding vows are taken, and the joyous couple rides off into the sunset, where a house in Long Island or Westchester county awaits.In the movies, the story takes the form of fashionista and famous writer Carrie Bradshaw and her mythical quest for money man Mr. Big. Never mind that Chris Noth, who plays Mr. Big, is pretty much a male model, or that Sarah Jessica Parker...well, I'm sure that she's considered amazingly attractive in England. Regardless, in the world of Sex and the City, she's the cute one and he's the rich one. And, I'm told, she finally gets him in the movie.
In the real world, the story is more about money than magic. After the wedding, the happy young couple has a couple of cute kids. Then, depending upon the strength of the pre-nup and the egregiousness of his affairs, the ex-model takes a nice payday and the cycle starts anew. Meanwhile, the rest of us are caught asking the same question: how, exactly, did Christie Brinkley end up with him?
I had always assumed that marriage to a model was a natural outgrowth of amazing success; I guess I saw it sort of like the welcome-home pack that universities give to freshman during their first day on campus: "here's your expensive apartment, your Brooks Brothers' suit, your beach house in the Hamptons and...oops, almost forgot, here's your model. Have fun and welcome to Bear Stearns!"
The truth, I recently discovered, is not that far off. According to a recent article in the New York Post, there is actually a huge industry that spends large amounts of time and energy connecting wealthy money men with trophy wives. In most cases, the clubs and bars that host these unions do so with a minimum of fuss and a maximum of discretion. Recently, however, Taj, a Manhattan hotspot, hosted the bimonthly "Fashion Meets Finance" mixer, an event that, as its name states, is intended to bring together the cream of Wall Street and the best of the Fashion industry. Depending on your perspective, this event is either the ultimate eugenics experiment or a matchmaker's dream come true.
Regardless, the event is far from subtle. The invitation states that "Women in fashion need men who can facilitate their pre-30 marriage/retirement plan [...] and men in finance need women who will allow them to leverage their career in the dating industry." The bluntness helped: there were so many RSVPs that the party's organizers had to stop accepting reservations.
The bluntness continued with a clear-eyed analysis of the participants' bona-fides. Male applicants had to state their titles and the companies that they worked for, and were also asked for photos and declarations of salaries. Presumably, the young fashion workers' qualifications were more prominently displayed.
While I find the bald-faced honesty of "Fashion Meets Finance" to be very attractive, I also have to wonder about the underlying intention of these events. As I stated earlier, I wouldn't be surprised to find out that this is part of a massive selective-breeding program or, alternately, that the whole thing is being set up by a crazy yenta somewhere. In all likelihood, though, it's actually a plot by New York's divorce lawyers to ensure a regular revenue flow!
Bruce Watson is a freelance writer, blogger, and all-around cheapskate. Somehow, the idea of soulless stockbrokers hooking up with gold-digging ex-models suits his sense of proportion.
Recent Posts
- Woman finds $100,000 baseball card; tries to sell it for $10 (1/08/2009)
- Analysts say unemployment makes a bad year to buy a home (1/08/2009)
- Obama stimulates luxury economy: Ritz-Carlton inauguration package sells for $99,000 (1/08/2009)
- Another casualty of the economy: larger classroom sizes (1/08/2009)
- Late loan payments hit a record high (1/08/2009)

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-17-2008 @ 8:28AM
Yvette said...
I think this is totally outrageous, it is because of money that sex sells, think about it if that man pictured above had no money do you think those two girs would be flirting with them. I am not sticking up for women either I think it is a easy way out for them to stay home and shop. I am not jealous I had a man like that ask yourself how much shopping can you do. I later on felt ignorant because he left me for someone else and I had to go back to school and get educated. Now I work hard for my money, I recently lost another boyfriend because he has money also, and unfortunately that is what women want. I am happy being me single mom with three kids and I bought my own home myself. Imagine that, I haven't given up on love I just gave up on money. Remember ladies when your no longer beautiful and young they can buy and sell more of you.......
Reply
6-17-2008 @ 10:26AM
Bruce Watson said...
Yvette-
You're absolutely right--when you market yourself as a commodity, be it an ATM (in the case of the men) or a piece of elbow candy (in the case of the ladies), it is ultimately a reduction. I don't like the idea of limiting myself like that, and I don't respect the way that these men and women seem inclined to do so.
Thank you for dropping by--and for your outstanding comment!
Reply
6-17-2008 @ 1:48PM
Linda said...
How about rich women that want to meet younger men?
Cougars have a lot to offer.....I'm looking !
Reply
6-17-2008 @ 3:07PM
Bruce Watson said...
That doesn't seem as exploitative to me. Then again, maybe I'm a sexist!
6-17-2008 @ 8:59PM
lin said...
This is nothing more than prostitution a la mode. There
isn't anything new about it. The Victorians did it decades ago under the guise of grooming young ladies
for the proper social circle. It's prostitution in a
presentation case.
The difference between this and the street walker is
you pay the street walker up front. The disguised
hooker gets hers later. The same holds true for the men
playing this game.
To paraphrase Shakespeare " A rose by any other
name is just as sweet."
Reply
6-17-2008 @ 3:08PM
Bruce Watson said...
Lin,
I'm not sure that's fair. Streetwalkers, at least, tend to be honest about exactly what they're getting and exactly what they're giving. This seems a lot shadier to me!
7-04-2008 @ 10:15AM
RAJAB said...
im poor iwant a.rich women who can hellp me im in kenya working as a. tech nician please hellp
Reply
7-04-2008 @ 10:16AM
Bruce Watson said...
Sorry, Rajab, it's not a dating service, but I wish you the best!