How I Spent My Tax Rebate: Paid extra on my mortgage
Filed under: Debt, Home, Mortgage Confidential
Some have asked me what's the best use for the $1,200 tax rebate (families with kids get more). That was an easy answer for me personally -- I paid extra on my mortgage principal.
You probably realize that each time you make the payment on a 30-year mortgage only a small portion goes toward actually paying off the principal, while a much larger share of it goes toward paying interest. For example, I calculated the payment for a $200,000 mortgage loan at a 5.5% rate using a mortgage calculator at Bankrate.com. The payment for a 30-year loan would be $1135.58. When one makes the first payment on that loan $218.81 goes toward the principal of the loan and $916.67 goes toward interest.
I then used that calculator to determine how much I would save if I put an extra $1,200 toward the mortgage. The mortgage would be paid off five months earlier and I would save a total of $5,677.90 in payments. You can do the same calculation for your mortgage at Bankrate.com and see what that unexpected $1,200 could do for you.
Personally I've made the commitment to be totally debt free before I start retirement. I've found the best way to eliminate debt is the Money Merge Account (TM) system and I've been working with Theresa Bolton Lynch, who introduced the system to me after I wrote about the snowball effect for paying down debt. I've dubbed this system the snowball effect on steroids.
Lita Epstein has written more than 20 books including the "Complete Idiot's Guide to Improving Your Credit Score.
You probably realize that each time you make the payment on a 30-year mortgage only a small portion goes toward actually paying off the principal, while a much larger share of it goes toward paying interest. For example, I calculated the payment for a $200,000 mortgage loan at a 5.5% rate using a mortgage calculator at Bankrate.com. The payment for a 30-year loan would be $1135.58. When one makes the first payment on that loan $218.81 goes toward the principal of the loan and $916.67 goes toward interest.
I then used that calculator to determine how much I would save if I put an extra $1,200 toward the mortgage. The mortgage would be paid off five months earlier and I would save a total of $5,677.90 in payments. You can do the same calculation for your mortgage at Bankrate.com and see what that unexpected $1,200 could do for you.
Personally I've made the commitment to be totally debt free before I start retirement. I've found the best way to eliminate debt is the Money Merge Account (TM) system and I've been working with Theresa Bolton Lynch, who introduced the system to me after I wrote about the snowball effect for paying down debt. I've dubbed this system the snowball effect on steroids.
Lita Epstein has written more than 20 books including the "Complete Idiot's Guide to Improving Your Credit Score.
Recent Posts
- AIG execs getting large payouts (11/21/2008)
- Animals & Money: Would you rent a dog? (11/21/2008)
- Palin unwittingly shows how turkeys die after pardoning 'Thanksgiving' (11/21/2008)
- Steps to the quickest way to improve your credit score (11/21/2008)
- How you pay for holiday gifts matters (11/21/2008)

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
5-15-2008 @ 5:36PM
Tracy Coenen said...
I cannot believe that you are promoting this system sold by a ****** *****. If you like this type of product, why don't you get it through a legitimate lender instead of one of these recruitment schemes? And why on earth would you shell out $3500 for this? Please tell me you didn't...
Reply
5-15-2008 @ 5:36PM
Lita Epstein said...
Tracy,
Have you ever used the system? This system is not a pyramid scheme nor does the method by which it is sold come anywhere close to a pyramid scheme. Agents are not paid for recruiting new agents - a key element of any pyramid scheme. There are many other differences to its structure as well.
The software is a powerful software whose calculations could not be duplicated without developing a similar software program. Yes you do buy the software, which you own for life and you never have to pay for the upgrades. You get those automatically.
You pay for it once and can use it on numerous mortgage loans throughout your lifetime. If you sell your home and buy a new one the program can be reset for the new loan for a minimal fee of $100. You get telephone support for the system for life as well.
Unlike other debt elimination programs you don't pay a monthly fee for the system. It's a one time fee. Check out the fees on all other debt elimination programs and you'll find their fees are higher.
When I first saw the system I too thought I could do it myself. But when I took a closer look I realized the calculations to minimize interest and eliminate debt faster were far more advanced than I could do. The system was developed based on the Australian banking system and tweaked for the U.S. banking system. It was developed over a 2-year period and then tested before being sold on the market starting about two years ago.
Yes, I do think this system is worth it. Using it I'm set to pay off my 15-year mortgage in just six years. Many people with a 30-year mortgage can cut that in half, depending on how much extra cash then can use for debt pay down each month. As part of the system you learn to use the bank's money (using an equity line) to pay down the principal on your mortgage faster. It's a powerful system and well worth the initial investment. A person with a 30-year mortgage who uses this system from the start can save between $100,000 and $200,000 in interest making it well-worth laying out the initial $3,500.
LIta
Reply
5-15-2008 @ 5:38PM
Lita Epstein said...
Tracy,
If you want to learn more about the program, read this excellent article from the trade publication for the mortgage banking industry:
http://www.brokerbanker-digital.com/brokerbanker/2007_vol108/
Lita
Reply
5-15-2008 @ 8:52PM
Tracy Coenen said...
Lita - A ****** ***** is not just a plan in which people are paid for recruiting. They recruit others who buy or sell their bogus stuff, and everyone in the food chain gets a cut of it. OF COURSE these companies scream that they're not a ****** *****. Who would admit such a thing?
The article you point to is a typical fluff piece. No substance whatsoever.
You said: "As part of the system you learn to use the bank's money (using an equity line) to pay down the principal on your mortgage faster."
Hello? If you are "using the bank's money" you're borrowing from them. Borrowing money to pay another loan does not get you ahead. But that statement is exactly the type of thing these scams use. It sounds good to the average person.
This is a confusing and risky product that the average consumer cannot and will not understand. They don't need to pay $3500 to a scheme to get out of debt. They need to pay down their debt.
And you've said it perfectly here: "...depending on how much extra cash then can use for debt pay down each month." The key to paying down debt isn't wasting money on a "system". It's actually paying extra on your debt.
I am just completely shocked that they sucked you into this.
Consider the silliness of this: You wrote a post on the value of paying an extra $1200 toward your mortgage. And in the same post, you tell us you flushed $3,500 down the toilet. I wonder how much that extra $3,500 would have saved you on your mortgage?
No disrespect intended here, but I think you really got taken.
Reply
5-15-2008 @ 9:00PM
Lita Epstein said...
Tracy,
You are speaking from pure ignorance of a very good program. No I do not pay more interest on the equity line. Used properly one pays very little. Before you start spreading lies about the system, why don't you have Theresa do a free analysis for you and show you how it works.
Lita
Reply
5-15-2008 @ 10:48PM
Theresa said...
Tracy, please define a pyramid scheme- can you sketch me a picture of what the hierarchy of one would look like? I am curious. --Here's what I took the time to find out- instead of spouting off about things I don't know about- which by the way- makes one look rather silly--
Pyramid schemes now come in so many forms that they may be difficult to recognize immediately. However, they all share one overriding characteristic. They promise consumers or investors large profits based primarily on recruiting others to join their program, not based on profits from any real investment or real sale of goods to the public. Some schemes may purport to sell a product, but they often simply use the product to hide their pyramid structure. There are two tell-tale signs that a product is simply being used to disguise a pyramid scheme: inventory loading and a lack of retail sales. Inventory loading occurs when a company's incentive program forces recruits to buy more products than they could ever sell, often at inflated prices. If this occurs throughout the company's distribution system, the people at the top of the pyramid reap substantial profits, even though little or no product moves to market. The people at the bottom make excessive payments for inventory that simply accumulates in their basements. A lack of retail sales is also a red flag that a pyramid exists. Many pyramid schemes will claim that their product is selling like hot cakes. However, on closer examination, the sales occur only between people inside the pyramid structure or to new recruits joining the structure, not to consumers out in the general public.
A Ponzi scheme is closely related to a pyramid because it revolves around continuous recruiting, but in a Ponzi scheme the promoter generally has no product to sell and pays no commission to investors who recruit new "members." Instead, the promoter collects payments from a stream of people, promising them all the same high rate of return on a short-term investment. In the typical Ponzi scheme, there is no real investment opportunity, and the promoter just uses the money from new recruits to pay obligations owed to longer-standing members of the program. In English, there is an expression that nicely summarizes this scheme: It's called "stealing from Peter to pay Paul." In fact some law enforcement officers call Ponzi schemes "Peter-Paul" scams. Many of you may be familiar with Ponzi schemes reported in the international financial news. For example, the MMM fund in Russia, which issued investors shares of stock and suddenly collapsed in 1994, was characterized as a Ponzi scheme.(2)
Both Ponzi schemes and pyramids are quite seductive because they may be able to deliver a high rate of return to a few early investors for a short period of time. Yet, both pyramid and Ponzi schemes are illegal because they inevitably must fall apart. No program can recruit new members forever. Every pyramid or Ponzi scheme collapses because it cannot expand beyond the size of the earth's population.(3) When the scheme collapses, most investors find themselves at the bottom, unable to recoup their losses.
Some people confuse pyramid and Ponzi schemes with legitimate multilevel marketing. Multilevel marketing programs are known as MLM's,(4) and unlike pyramid or Ponzi schemes, MLM's have a real product to sell. More importantly, MLM's actually sell their product to members of the general public, without requiring these consumers to pay anything extra or to join the MLM system. MLM's may pay commissions to a long string of distributors, but these commission are paid for real retail sales, not for new recruits.
Reply
5-15-2008 @ 11:12PM
Tracy Coenen said...
Theresa - I can cut and paste from websites too. Believe me, I've done plenty of research on MLMs/****** ***** like UFF. I understand how they work, and I understand all the arguments you're trained to use to make it seem like a legitimate business.
5-15-2008 @ 10:48PM
Theresa said...
Tracy,
to continue, please take a look at our structure then take a look at your neighborhood insurance agency, mortgage brokerage and real estate offices- they might be a little offended should you refer to them as pyramid schemes
Perhaps, one should actually investigate and educate themselves about ALL things they feel a need to speak about publicly-
Reply
5-15-2008 @ 11:13PM
Tracy Coenen said...
Theresa - I'd never call any of those businesses ****** *****, because they're not. They're real businesses.
5-15-2008 @ 11:25PM
Theresa said...
What is the difference? Please spell it out with specific examples - is it in the hierarchy? the pay distribution?
Reply
5-15-2008 @ 11:53PM
Tracy Coenen said...
Lita - I didn't say you're paying "more" interest on an equity line. But if you're "using an equity line to pay down the principal on your mortgage" (your words), then you're not accomplishing anything. Replacing debt (mortgage) with debt (equity line) gets you nowhere.
My time is far too valuable to waste it with a "free" analysis from this scheme. It has all the hallmarks of the thinly disguised ****** *****(also known in the U.S. as an MLM) and I'm not interested in playing the game with them.
I've done plenty of research on plenty of MLMs to know what they're all about. How long did it take them to tell you that "you'd be great" at doing what they do? And that this would be a natural fit? And that since you're so successful with the program you'd have no problem selling it? And since you're recommending it anyway you might as well sign up and let them get the service through you?
This is a typical recruiting scheme that sells an overpriced product to those who can least afford to waste the money on it. What a shame that it's being promoted here.
Reply
5-15-2008 @ 11:58PM
Lita Epstein said...
Tracy,
You are obviously afraid to find out that you are wrong, so you won't even try a free analysis. I promise it won't cost you a cent to find out about the program.
You don't pay interest on an equity line to pay off a mortgage using this system. That shows how little you know about the system. It's purpose is to minimize interest across the board and it does it very well. Used properly interest on the equity line is minimal because you're carrying very little debt on it.
You're totally wrong. I even posted an article by the mortgage brokers trade publication about the system and you obviously refused to even read that story. If you won't even take the time to read that story, stop wasting my time here.
Lita
Reply
5-16-2008 @ 12:32AM
Tracy Coenen said...
Lita - I read the article. It's a typical marketing piece. Where on earth does one get an equity line of credit with a 0% interest rate? I want one of those! Sign me up!
I find your promotion of this scam disheartening, but I'm done discussing it here.
5-16-2008 @ 12:36AM
Lita Epstein said...
Tracy,
I never said a 0% equity line existed. That's your fantasy. What I did say is that the system helps one to minimize the balance carried on the equity line. Can you understand that concept or is that beyond your capabilities.
The Mortgage Broker trade newsletter is not owned by United First Financial, which is the company that developed the Money Merge system. It is a legitimate publication of the Mortgage Brokers Association. I really do hope you stop wasting my time making unwarranted and uneducated comments.
Lita
Reply
5-16-2008 @ 8:35AM
Peter Piper said...
cat fight......
Reply
5-16-2008 @ 9:37AM
Tracy Coenen said...
Lita - I understand MLMs very well, and I understand those involved with them have a vested interest in them being the greatest thing since sliced bread. Anyone else who has done the research and disagrees is just a dummy. I understand where you're coming from.
Reply
5-16-2008 @ 9:40AM
Lita Epstein said...
Tracy,
You've refused a demonstration of the product, so you can't possibly comment on its usefulness or know whether or not it is a scam.
If you read the article from the Mortgage Brokers Association you would know that the compensation structure is not set up as an MLM. The independent agents of United First Financial are compensated using a formula similar to that of mortgage brokers, insurance agents and real estate agents.
You truly should research a subject before you start calling it a scam and a pyramid scheme.
Lita
Reply
5-16-2008 @ 10:25AM
Tracy Coenen said...
Lita - I've refused to commit corporate fraud too, but that doesn't mean the results of my investigations of cases of corporate fraud are invalid. I don't need a "free analysis" to know what they're peddling and how they're peddling it. And throwing away $3500 on this scam is not "research".
5-16-2008 @ 9:41AM
ThatHollie said...
Accelerator loans are a legitimate way of paying off your mortgage faster...have a look at http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Banking/HomeFinancing/ANewWayToPayOffYourHouse.aspx
to see how they work (independent of this particular software).
My question is...why would I want to pay off my house? how did you decide this was the right thing for you to do? Plenty of money experts will tell you not to pay off your house even if you have the money to do so.
Reply
5-16-2008 @ 9:49AM
Lita Epstein said...
Hollie,
Why pay the interest to the banks? For at least the first half of the mortgage you are paying more interest than principal.
While I realize some money managers say one needs a tax deduction, but even if you are in the 35% tax bracket for every dollar you spend on interest you only save 35 cents on taxes.
I'd rather live rent/mortgage free and then use the payment I would have made to build my investment portfolio. But, of course, it's a personal choice. Watching people lose their homes to foreclosure, I think most of us can see that debt has become a lifestyle we can no longer afford.
Lita
Reply