Lowering the Boomers on Social Security
Filed under: Borrowing, Debt, Retire, Wealth
As someone who was born at the end of the Baby Boom and who's been paying into the Social Security system since I got my first McJob as a teenager in 1982, I'm worried that when it comes time for me to get my cut, there'll be nothing left. After all, according to USA Today, I'm one of 80 million Americans born between 1946 and 1964 who could qualify for Social Security and Medicare in the next 22 years.
The first wave of Boomers broke into the Social Security system this week, when 62-year-old Kathleen Casey-Kirschling -- whose midnight birth on Jan. 1, 1946, makes her America's first Boomer -- signed on for benefits. This opened the floodgates for the 3.2 million citizens who hit the big 6-2 next year, making them eligible for early retirement. According to the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, the average age at which workers in this country start receiving Social Security is 63.
Those who've crunched all these numbers say that if this trend continues, Social Security rolls will increase by 34 million by 2030, and Medicare by 35 million. The Social Security trust fund will start paying out more benefits than it collects by 2017 and is projected to deplete its reserves by 2041.
While the good folks in Congress all seem to agree that something needs to be done to save Social Security, our elected officials are at loggerheads as to exactly what this something should be. It's hard to say if this will change under our new president: Of the two parties' front-runners, Obama, Clinton and Huckabee all favor keeping Social Security solvent, while McCain wants to develop a plan to would allow workers to invest a portion of their payroll tax in private accounts they'd manage themselves.
Given the dearth of solutions coming out of Washington, the Concord Coalition was inspired to organize a "Fiscal Wake-up Tour" to make voters more aware of the Social Security situation and ask us what compromises we'd be willing to make to ensure that future generations get their bennies. the coalition is also asking presidential candidates to explain how they plan to address the long-term fiscal challenges they'll face if elected.
The tour has caught the attention of the White House. At a recent press briefing, Jim Nussle, director of the Office of Management and Budget, said, "This Fiscal Wake-Up Tour, I think, has been one that has been waking up members of Congress. And you see that in a bipartisan way."
How Congress will answer this wake-up call remains to be seen.
Recent Posts
- Insurance Tip #2: You may not need long-term care insurance (9/06/2008)
- NJ may be the most stressed state (9/06/2008)
- Landscaping bargains abound in the fall (9/06/2008)
- Happy 10th birthday, Google, from a willing slave (9/06/2008)
- Insurance Tip #1: Your agent does not have to act in your best interest (9/06/2008)

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-15-2008 @ 2:01PM
Dr Coles said...
The full retirement age is based on maintaining a 50% death rate, so the government does not have to pay any paid for benefits but to half of the investors. The government gets 15% of all wages (up to $102,000) in America and is so incompetent as an investment manager, if we could we would have fired them, they do not invest our money and grow the funds. The problem with Social Security is totally caused by government. No, matter your political party affiliation, and setting aside your thoughts on issues. We all need to remember what it is to be an American Citizen. We need to make sure our elected representatives obey their Oath of Office and keep their Oath of Allegiance. See http://tinyurl.com/2znnvl Know whom you are voting for. http://www.fms.treas.gov/fr/index.html
Reply
2-16-2008 @ 7:50AM
Mike said...
The first thing we need is the truth and it will not come from politicians.
-------------------------
"...trust fund will start paying..."
"...the trust funds themselves do not hold money. They are simply accounts. Similarly,benefits are not paid from the trust funds, but from the treasury."
...
"Contrary to popular belief, Social Security taxes are not deposited into the Social Security trust funds."
[CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE -April 29, 1998 - 94-593 EPW]
----------------------------------
FEBRUARY 3, 2005 -
SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON AGING - UNITED STATES SENATE
" Candidly, the Social Security Trust Funds are nothing more and nothing less than a sub-account in the government's financial records and badger accounts. They are not real trust funds."
[David Walker, comptroller general, Government Accountability
Office, Washington, DC]
Not REAL?
Reply
2-23-2008 @ 7:44PM
Michael Fielder said...
It disgusts me to think that at the age of 53 all I have to look forward to is paying the maximum amount based on an income that now exceeds 200k a year. No I haven't made that much for my entire life, it probably averages about 90-100k over my working life. I'm talking about 35 years in the workforce, paying everything I am supposed to, all to be told the system is nearly insolvent. While I do have other retirement funds coming my way, it doesn't erase the thousands of dollars I have poured into this debacle, not to mention I am still contributing to something I may never see. I consider this to be not only shameful of our government, but the biggest crime against the people who honestly continue to pay into something they may never see
Reply